Workload and job satisfaction

12th March 2012


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Skills ,
  • CPD ,
  • Ethics ,
  • Sustainability

Author

IEMA

The IEMA practitioners' survey 2012 reveals environmental professionals' workloads and how happy they are in their roles

The majority of environment professionals are happy in their work – more than two-thirds (68.2%) are either satisfied or very satisfied in their roles. According to their feedback, this contentment is due mainly to intrinsic factors associated with respondents’ employment, such as enjoying the interesting and challenging nature of their work, being able to make a difference in their organisation or community, and having a varied role at work.

Of the 1,209 respondents providing details of job satisfaction, 36% say they enjoy their work and/or they find it challenging, and/or interesting. A quarter report the source of their satisfaction as being able to make a difference in their organisation or community. Only 3% said that good pay and benefits gave them a high degree of job satisfaction.

Some respondents who are not happy in their jobs provided anecdotal feedback on why this is the case. Reasons are many and varied, but a key one is a lack of development potential in their role. This was reported by 23% of those providing feedback. Most of the other main factors contributing to an absence of job satisfaction relate to organisational issues such as perceived poor management, a lack of strategic direction, too much pressure and a lack of financial resources. In 17% of cases, dissatisfaction is due to a perceived lack of commitment by the organisation to the environment.

Survey respondents were also asked if they had experienced any changes to their workload over the course of 2011, in respect of its scope and variety and the amount of work they were expected to complete. As figures 9 and 10 (below) show, almost two-thirds of members report an increase in the scope and variety (65.3%), and/or quantity (63.9%) of their workload in 2011.

The first type of change – more varied work – could have a positive impact on the quality of an individual’s working life, given that one of the main factors contributing to respondents’ job satisfaction is the interesting and challenging nature of their work. It is less likely that the second type of change – an increase in the amount of work – has the potential to have a similarly positive impact on environment professionals’ job satisfaction levels.

As figure 11 (below) shows, more than one-third of respondents (35.8%) report a rise in the number of hours worked in 2011. Examination of the feedback supplied by the 291 respondents giving reasons for their dissatisfaction at work reveals that 17% are unhappy due to having too much work and/ or insufficient time to complete their work, while 12% state that a lack of resources is the reason for their dissatisfaction.

Figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that in 2011 full-time employees in the UK worked some of the longest hours in Europe, working an average of 42.7 hours a week, compared with the EU average of 37.4 hours. The ONS data also reveal that, on average, managers and senior officials in the UK have a total working week of 46.2 hours.

Bigger workloads and longer hours can increase the potential for an individual to experience stress at work. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development’s 2011 annual sickness absence survey found that stress, for the first time, is the most common cause of long-term sickness absence across the UK workforce. There was a particular increase in stress-related absence among public sector organisations.


Read the full survey results:

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

EU and UK citizens fear net-zero delivery deficit

Support for net zero remains high across the UK and the EU, but the majority of citizens don't believe that major emitters and governments will reach their climate targets in time.

16th May 2024

Read more

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

Taxing the extraction of fossil fuels in the world’s most advanced economies could raise $720bn (£575bn) by 2030 to support vulnerable countries facing climate damages, analysis has found.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close