Water Framework Directive compliance in EIA
- Pollution & Waste Management ,
- Water ,
- Natural resources ,
Alexander Scorey of Hyder Consulting discusses the integrating Water Framework Directive (WFD) assessments into wider environmental impact assessments (EIA) and habitats regulations assessments (HRA) to improve project efficiency.
“Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water” otherwise known as the WFD, was adopted by the EU in 2000. It established a framework for maintaining and improving the quality of European coastal, estuarine, river, lake and ground waters and water bodies. This quality is monitored via chemical, biological and hydromorphological indicators which are used to report on the overall status of each water body. The aim is for water bodies to achieve “good” status, which means that the water body has the optimum chemical, biological and hydromorphological qualities for a safe, clean and biodiverse water environment.
Every six years, each EU member state must report on their progress in achieving the target of “good” status in their water bodies. The United Kingdom reported in 2009 through the River Basin Management Plans, and will be reporting again in 2015. Progress will have been made for all water bodies, but the target will not have been reached and the government will set out further measures in the 2015 River Basin Management Plans to meet this target.
Projects within, or that could affect, the water environment must demonstrate that they will not cause a deterioration of the status of water bodies in their zone of influence, or that they will not inhibit their future achievement of “good” status.
This assurance involves, an assessment of the effect of the project on the various indicator criteria for each water body.
To integrate this assessment with other wider environmental assessments, such as EIA or HRA, an initial assessment should be made of the project against the WFD quality criteria. This can be undertaken during the scoping process of a statutory EIA or HRA.
Simple baseline data for each water body can be found within Appendix B of the 2009 River Basin Management Plans with more complex baseline data on the indicators used to classify water bodies within the UK to be found here. This information is useful in developing the context for an initial assessment and identifying the critical thresholds that a project must not affect, to achieve compliance.
This initial assessment should take a systematic approach in considering each aspect of the project during construction, operation and decommissioning (if applicable) individually, and identify whether an aspect could potentially compromise the achievement of the various chemical, biological or hydromorphological criteria of the water bodies. This assessment can often be carried out by an environmental coordinator, if they have the skills and experience, which can save time and expense to project developers.
The outcome of this initial assessment should identify any potential effects from the project that could compromise WFD objectives. This data can then be used to scope more detailed assessment work required to show compliance. Initial assessments should be informed by consultation with the regulatory bodies (Environment Agency in England, Natural Resources Wales in Wales) and the outcomes should be discussed with them also to agree the methodology and scope of the assessment.
If the initial assessment is undertaken concurrently with the EIA or HRA scoping, and early in the project, a comprehensive scope of works can be drawn up which covers all the survey and assessment requirements to comply with this legislation. This will minimise extra costs and programme delays during the later stages of the projects. Assessments required for an EIA or HRA are often similar to those required for a WFD assessment, so the overlapping nature of the requirements can also drive project efficiency.
In conclusion, by considering the WFD early in a project, engaging with the appropriate regulatory body, and integrating the process into wider environmental assessments, the burden of demonstrating compliance with the directive can be greatly reduced for project developers.
This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.Alexander Scorey is a senior environmental consultant at Hyder Consulting
Demand for fossil fuels will peak by 2025 if all national net-zero pledges are implemented in full and on time, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has forecast.
The Green Homes Grant is set to deliver only a fraction of the jobs and improvements intended, leading to calls for more involvement from local authorities in future schemes.
COVID-19 recovery packages have largely focused on protecting, rather than transforming, existing industries, and have been a “lost opportunity” for speeding up the global energy transition.
Half of the world's 40 largest listed oil and gas companies will have to slash their production by at least 50% by the 2030s to align with the goals of the Paris Agreement, new analysis has found.
None of England’s water and sewerage companies achieved all environmental expectations for the period 2015 to 2020, the Environment Agency has revealed. These targets included the reduction of total pollution incidents by at least one-third compared with 2012, and for incident self-reporting to be at least 75%.
The UK’s pipeline for renewable energy projects could mitigate 90% of job losses caused by COVID-19 and help deliver the government’s ‘levelling up’ agenda. That is according to a recent report from consultancy EY-Parthenon, which outlines how the UK’s £108bn “visible pipeline” of investible renewable energy projects could create 625,000 jobs.
Billions of people worldwide have been unable to access safe drinking water and sanitation in their homes during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a progress report from the World Health Organisation focusing on the UN’s sixth Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 6) – to “ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all by 2030”.