The gender gap: Men and women's pay

22nd March 2011

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Skills ,
  • Training ,
  • CPD ,
  • Qualifications



The difference between men and women's pay in the environment profession. As detailed in the IEMA pay and benefits survey 2011

Figure 6 shows the variation in salaries between men and women. Median total earnings for men are on average 24.2% higher than those for women. In IEMA’s first salary survey in 2007, the total earnings for men and women were £37,000 and £29,000 respectively – 25.4% higher for men.

This suggests a small decrease in the wage gap since 2007, although the difference could be down to differences in the samples as the poll is not a matched sample. However, if the gender pay gap has narrowed for environmental professionals, it reflects the trend across the whole economy.

The Office for National Statistics recently released data showing that in the 12 months to April 2010 the gap between full-time employed men and women across the whole of the UK shrank from 12.2% to 10.2%. The comparable figure in 1997 was 17%.

An important caveat in considering the wide earnings gap between male and female environmental professionals in our sample is that the age distributions of the sexes are very different. The female age profile is biased towards the younger end; 57.3% of female members are below the age of 35, compared with 29% of male respondents. As we saw in figure 5, median annual total earnings increase with age till the mid-40s when they stabilise for men and dip for women. As younger individuals dominate the female membership profile, this may contribute towards the lower average earnings in this group.

It is important to note, however, that average earnings for women are lower than for men in nine out of 10 age categories, which reflects a wider trend not purely associated with career breaks and a younger profile. When we look in detail at salaries for men and women across the age ranges, as shown in table 5 we can see the wage gap is far from uniform.

Women actually have slightly higher salaries between the ages of 21 and 24, but this reverses in their mid-to-late 20s. Both men and women’s salaries increase up to the 40–44 age group at a similar rate (see figure 5), albeit with women earning less: at 40–44 the wage gap is 5.4%, compared with the overall gap of 24.2%. From the ages 45 to 54 there is a significant increase in the differential. Although the overall wage gap is around 24%, it is most significant from 45 onwards, when professionals of both sexes might be expected to be in more senior positions.

Table 5 also shows how the wage gaps from our 2007 salary survey compared with those in 2011. Although the gap has increased in two age categories, the decreases in the other three age categories outweigh these rises. For example, the gap between the 35–44 age group has decreased by 7.1% and between the 55–64 age group by 16.2%. In contrast, the increases between the 25–34 and 45–54 age groups are 0.8% and 0.4% respectively.

Table 5: Gender wage gap by age for the 2007 and 2011 surveys - men to women (age categories from 2007)
2007 2011
Age Difference % Gap Difference % Gap
21-24 £677 3.1% -£2,000 -9.5%
25-34 £1,727 5.8% £2,100 6.6%
35-44 £6,800 17.0% £4,070 9.9%
45-54 £6,500 16.3% £7,000 16.7%
55-64 £9,800 24.5% £3,533 8.3%

Read the full survey results:


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

IEMA Profile: Matthew Thomas BSc (Hons), Cert IOSH, MIEMA, CEnv, operations director, Compass Environmental Consultancy

Read more about IEMA Profile: Matthew Thomas BSc (Hons), Cert IOSH, MIEMA, CEnv, operations director, Compass Environmental Consultancy

31st May 2024

Read more

Senior consultant, EcoAct

3rd April 2024

Read more

At a School of Management careers event at Cranfield University, one of our IEMA-approved university partners, we spoke to students from a range of postgraduate courses, from supply chain to marketing and management.

28th March 2024

Read more

To make real change on sustainability, it’s time to redefine leadership models, writes Chris Seekings

1st February 2024

Read more

Caris Graham (she/her) is Diverse Sustainability Initiative officer at IEMA

1st February 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool reflects on the highlights of the past year and what they mean for the future

1st February 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close