Solar companies fail in judicial review of policy
- Business & Industry ,
- Energy ,
Keith Davidson from LexisPSL on the failure of a judicial review application by solar companies challenging Decc's decision to close the Renewables Obligation (RO) in April 2015.
A judicial review application by solar companies challenging Decc’s decision to close the Renewables Obligation (RO) in April 2015 has failed. The High Court ruled in Solar Century Holdings Ltd and others v Secretary of state for energy and climate change  EWHC 3677 that the government’s cuts to subsidies for large solar projects are legal.
In May 2014, the government issued a consultation paper on future subsidies to support the installation of solar photovoltaics (PV). It included plans to bring forward the closure date of the RO from 2017 to April 2015. Decc’s justification was the unexpectedly high levels of large-scale solar PV deployment, which risked breaching the cap imposed by the Treasury’s levy control framework (LCF).
Solar Century, Lark Energy, Orta Solar Farms and TGC Renewables brought a rolled-up judicial review application that challenged the policy change. Decc confirmed in October 2014 the early closure of the RO, though it extended the “grace period” from three to 12 months.
The claimants challenged the policy change on four grounds: closure of the scheme before 2017 was ultra vires; pre-legislation statements amounted to an “assurance” that should bind the government; previous policy statements gave rise to a “legitimate expectation” that cannot be altered; and the introduction of retrospective “grace periods” was unfair and unlawful. The judge rejected each ground and dismissed the claim.
The decision underlines that levy schemes subject to the financial limits imposed by the Treasury can change. The LCF, therefore, represents a systemic risk that all operators must always take into account.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.
Over two million hectares of Brazilian rainforest could be legally converted to supply the UK with soy under a new anti-deforestation law proposed by the government, the WWF has found.
In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).
In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.