Flaws in REACH evaluation

10th March 2016


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Manufacturing ,
  • Chemicals

Author

Robert McCann

The substance evaluation process under the EU REACH regulation needs to be improved, according to an independent assessment report commissioned by the European Chemicals Agency.

The study examined the effectiveness, efficiency, transparency and workability of substance evaluation (SEv). It revealed notable differences between how REACH-competent authorities in member states (MSCAs) handle the process and also differences in the way registrants (and groups of registrants) act in response to requests for information about their substances. ‘Although there are clear rules for the way that MSCAs act and how registrants respond in SEv, it is clear that different authorities have their own styles,’ it said.

In addition, SEv is regarded as less than transparent by some MSCAs and industry, while the process was perceived to be more lengthy than needed. The research found that, if a consortium of firms acts for a substance, the process tends to be relatively straightforward. Otherwise it can be complicated and possibly contradictory because registrants might disagree on responses and communication might be uncoordinated.

Recommendations in the study include: tackling the short deadlines that registrants and authorities struggle to comply with; improving communication to registrants of the schedule for decisions; accelerating the referral process to prevent a backlog of cases; and improving the links between substance evaluation and compliance checking.

The study was carried out by consultancy Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and the government body Infrastructure UK, with support from BRE and toxicology experts Peter Fisk Associates. The findings will feed into the agency’s report on REACH implementation, due later this year.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

SBTi clarifies that ‘no change has been made’ to its stance on offsetting

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

Senior consultant, EcoAct

3rd April 2024

Read more

Around 20% of the plastic recycled is polypropylene, but the diversity of products it protects has prevented safe reprocessing back into food packaging. Until now. David Burrows reports

3rd April 2024

Read more

IEMA presents a digital campaign to share knowledge and inspire action in sustainability

2nd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close