Environmental risk assessment in shale gas applications

15th March 2016


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Generation ,
  • Conventional ,
  • Fossil fuels ,
  • Business & Industry

Author

Patrick Kamanda

Nigel Moore, principal consultant at TNEI Services, explores the difference between assessment of risks and assessment of impacts.

Environmental risk assessments (ERA) are used when the consequences of development are uncertain. All on-shore deep-drilling exploration activities have this element of uncertainty to them which is why the energy and climate change department (Decc) requires shale gas operators to submit ERAs in advance of drilling activity.

An ERA must be informed by a probability measure. The risk of an impact is equal to its consequences multiplied by its probability. ERAs must address potentially significant environmental and human health risks and well operators must demonstrate that such issues have been identified and mechanisms put in place to manage them when drilling.

In contrast, environmental impact assessments (EIA) address outcomes where the consequences of development are predictable and can be assessed with a degree of certainty. EIAs consider the impacts derived from both planned (impact) and unplanned (risk) events associated with development. Accordingly, an environmental statement should be informed by the risks and mitigation measures identified within the ERA.

When producing ERAs, well operators must use Decc guidance which brings together the good practice of the environment department (Defra) , the Environment Agency and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering . The approach calls for the assessment of key risk categories that share common pathways and sensitive receptors.

Key risk categories associated with shale gas exploration

  1. Seismicity and ground stability

  2. Surface and sub-surface ground works

  3. Water acquisition

  4. Chemical mixing

  5. Borehole installation and integrity

  6. High volume hydraulic fracturing

  7. Management of flow-back fluids

  8. Gas management

  9. Offsite disposal

  10. Well closure and abandonment

For each risk category, the magnitude of the impact, the sensitivity of receptors and the effect of mitigation is considered first. These findings then inform an assessment of residual risk which combines the probability of an event occurring and the consequences for people and the environment if it does occur, making use of an ERA risk magnitude matrix as shown below.

ERA risk magnitude matrix

Consequence Probability Very low Low Medium High Very low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Medium Medium Medium Low Medium Medium High High Medium Medium High High

In practice, there are tried and tested design solutions and mitigation measures available to avoid or minimise unplanned or uncertain risks and environmental impacts to an acceptable level.

Generally, they are considered acceptable when they are as low as reasonably practicable. This encourages operators to move beyond minimum standards in a continuous effort for improvement. However, the threshold of acceptability can vary with the sensitivity of a location, for example, risks or impacts that are acceptable in urban locations may not be acceptable in rural locations.

Risks and impacts: striking the right balance for assessment

When considering shale gas exploration, the consequences of deep drilling at depths of one to two miles have so far been assessed as high; for example:

  • Pollution: a well failure at depth contaminating subterranean water reserves; or
  • Seismic activity: drilling causing ground instability.

However, the probability of such events occurring is considered to be low; given:

  • Pollution: the high degree of well integrity on operational sites and the lack of pollution pathways between the deep sources and surface receptors,
  • Seismic activity: the lack of seismic pathways between sources and surface receptor.

Accordingly, the risks engaged by deep drilling associated with shale gas exploration are likely to be low. Conversely, the consequences of above ground spills and contamination associated with day-to-day operations are likely to be of a smaller magnitude, but the probability would appear to be much higher given the existence of clear pollution pathways at ground level or just below, in other words, within the catchment of the water table or within 300 metres of the surface . It is important that EIA takes forward the findings of an ERA and is able to focus on the main likely environmental impacts.

Conclusion

The assessment of risks and impacts are indelibly linked; ERAs should inform EIAs. To date, the reporting of risks associated with shale gas exploration within the media has focused on the consequences of deep drilling with little regard for their probability or the risks from surface spills or contamination. The concern for assessors in the future is that this lack of balance in reporting must not lead to under-assessing probable risks while over-assessing improbable ones.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Is the sea big enough?

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

The UK’s major cities lag well behind their European counterparts in terms of public transport use. Linking development to transport routes might be the answer, argues Huw Morris

3rd April 2024

Read more

Tom Harris examines the supply chain constraints facing the growing number of interconnector projects

2nd April 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

A consortium including IEMA and the Good Homes Alliance have drafted a letter to UK government ministers expressing disappointment with the proposed Future Homes Standard.

26th February 2024

Read more

Global corporations such as Amazon and Google purchased a record 46 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind energy last year, according to BloombergNEF (BNEF).

13th February 2024

Read more

Three-quarters of UK adults are concerned about the impact that climate change will have on their bills, according to polling commissioned by Positive Money.

13th February 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close