Economic cost of climate change underestimated, study finds

13th January 2015

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Mitigation


Katharine Mason

The economic damage caused by a tonne of carbon dioxide emissions could be six times higher than previously calculated, according to scientists at Stanford University.

The value of this damage, also known as the social cost of carbon, is used to calculate the costs and benefits of action to mitigate climate change.

“If the social cost of carbon is higher, many more mitigation measures will pass a cost-benefit analysis," said study co-author Delavane Diaz, a PhD student in the department of management science and engineering at Stanford's school of engineering.

For example, a 2013 US study concluded that a tonne of CO2 emitted in 2015 would cause $37 worth of economic damage, including decreased agricultural yields, harm to human health and lower worker productivity. However, the scientists at Stanford concluded that the cost is actually $220 a tonne.

The study pours doubt on a computer model widely-used for calculating the economic impacts of climate change, known as an integrated assessment model (IAM). The model has been used by governments in the US, UK, Canada, Mexico, France, Germany and Norway to analyse climate and energy policy proposals.

The Stanford research highlights the limitations of IAMs, such as the failure to account for how damages associated with climate change might persist over time.

Co-author Frances Moore, a PhD student in environment and resources in Stanford's school of earth sciences, said: “For 20 years now, the models have assumed that climate change can't affect the basic growth rate of the economy.

"But a number of new studies suggest this may not be true. If climate change affects not only a country's economic output but also its growth, then that has a permanent effect that accumulates over time, leading to a much higher social cost of carbon,” she said.

The scientists modified an IAM called the dynamic integrated climate economy model (DICE) and modified it to allow climate change to affect the growth rate in the economy; to account for adaptation to climate change and to represent high- and low-income countries.

One major finding of the analysis is that the higher cost of damage to the economy would justify very rapid and very early mitigation to limit global temperature rise to 2°C.

“This effect is not included in the standard IAMs,” Moore said, “so until now it's been very difficult to justify aggressive and potentially expensive mitigation measures because the damages just aren't large enough.”

However, the scientists note that their study does not factor in the potential for mitigation actions to also impact growth.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Weather damage insurance claims hit record high

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close