Commission closer to taking action over power station

7th August 2014

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Energy ,
  • Generation



The European commission has issued a "reasoned opinion" setting out its case on UK government infringements of EU law when granting permission for the Pembroke power station in Wales.

The 2GW gas-fired plant, which is operated by RWE Generation UK and is one of the largest of its kind in Europe, officially opened in 2012. The commission has now concluded that the government failed to adhere to the requirements of the directives on environmental impact assessment and habitats before granting consent for its construction. The commission had first raised concerns in 2012 about the plant’s cooling system, alleging that discharges of warm water with a high biocide load was damaging the surrounding ecosystem, which is a marine special area of conservation and protected under EU law.

“Development consent should only [have been] given after all the potential environmental impacts have been assessed,” notes the opinion, adding that this does not appear to have been the case for the plant. “Development and construction consents as well as a water abstraction licence and a permit for the dredging of the cooling system intake and outflow were granted before the full environmental assessments were completed.” The commission says that the warm water from the cooling system entering the protected Milford Haven waterway is damaging small fish, their eggs and other smaller organisms.

The opinion also raises concerns about the application of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive on the final permits issued for the plant, in particular accepting the cooling system as best available technology in the location and allowing an environmental quality standard to be breached as a result.

In a statement, RWE Generation UK said the reasoned opinion was a matter for the UK government. But it noted that Decc had granted consent for the plant in February 2009 after a “thorough and robust determination process, which included consultation with the Environment Agency regarding operational aspects of the project”. It added that the agency had granted an environmental permit in November 2011 after considering the potential impacts of the plant. “Since then, no legal action has been brought against RWE or [the] station and we are continuing to operate the plant in accordance with the strict conditions set out in our permit.”

Issuing an opinion is the precursor for taking legal action. The government has two months to respond to the commission’s findings.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close