Transport for London stands ground on air quality claims

8th April 2015


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Transport ,
  • Local government ,
  • Business & Industry ,
  • Air

Author

Doug Mackenzie

Transport for London (TfL) is to appeal after the advertising watchdog ruled that its claim that the ultra-low emission zone would halve air pollution from vehicles was misleading.

The claim was made in an advertisement in London newspaper the Evening Standard, which stated: “Introducing the zone in 2020 will encourage the use of newer, cleaner vehicles to reduce vehicle pollution by half.”

Campaign group Clean Air in London challenged the claim, saying it only referred to particular pollutants, rather than all pollution from vehicles.

TfL argued that it had used the term “vehicle pollution” rather than listing individual pollutants in order to avoid using technical jargon in an advertisement.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) acknowledged this aim, but considered that consumers would be likely to believe that the advert referred to all types of vehicle pollution unless it was clearly stated otherwise.

The ASA’s ruling states that TfL’s claim that pollutants would be halved only referred to nitrogen oxide (NOx) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions. It excludes carbon dioxide, which is predicted to be reduced by 15% when the ULEZ is implemented, the ASA said.

Michele Dix, TfL’s managing director with responsibility for ULEZ said: “We have provided robust evidence which substantiates the claims made in the ULEZ advert and will be appealing this decision.

“Due to the complex nature of the proposals, the advert was designed to capture the most important points and avoid confusing jargon. It gave an overview of the plans, and encouraged people to visit our website for more information and to take part in a full public consultation,” she said.

CO2 is greenhouse gas rather than a legal pollutant, she added.

Clean Air in London also complained about two other aspects of the advertisement, but the ASA did not uphold these complaints.


Transform articles

Regulator publishes new code to tackle 'greenwashing'

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.

22nd September 2021

Read more

The UK government must develop regulation to stop the financial sector from providing billions of pounds to companies that threaten rainforests worldwide, WWF has said.

10th September 2021

Read more

Over two million hectares of Brazilian rainforest could be legally converted to supply the UK with soy under a new anti-deforestation law proposed by the government, the WWF has found.

26th August 2021

Read more

The Better Business Act would put responsibility to society and the environment on the same footing as responsibility to shareholders, explains Chris Turner

30th July 2021

Read more

In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).

30th July 2021

Read more

Thames Water has been fined £4m after untreated sewage escaped from sewers below London into a park and a river.

30th July 2021

Read more

In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.

28th May 2021

Read more

Are voluntary commitments enough to make the private sector act on waste? David Burrows explores the issues

28th May 2021

Read more

Government announcements on infrastructure reveal a direction of travel but key details are still unknown, says Huw Morris

29th January 2021

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert