Transport for London stands ground on air quality claims
- Transport ,
- Local government ,
- Business & Industry ,
Transport for London (TfL) is to appeal after the advertising watchdog ruled that its claim that the ultra-low emission zone would halve air pollution from vehicles was misleading.
The claim was made in an advertisement in London newspaper the Evening Standard, which stated: “Introducing the zone in 2020 will encourage the use of newer, cleaner vehicles to reduce vehicle pollution by half.”
Campaign group Clean Air in London challenged the claim, saying it only referred to particular pollutants, rather than all pollution from vehicles.
TfL argued that it had used the term “vehicle pollution” rather than listing individual pollutants in order to avoid using technical jargon in an advertisement.
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) acknowledged this aim, but considered that consumers would be likely to believe that the advert referred to all types of vehicle pollution unless it was clearly stated otherwise.
The ASA’s ruling states that TfL’s claim that pollutants would be halved only referred to nitrogen oxide (NOx) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions. It excludes carbon dioxide, which is predicted to be reduced by 15% when the ULEZ is implemented, the ASA said.
Michele Dix, TfL’s managing director with responsibility for ULEZ said: “We have provided robust evidence which substantiates the claims made in the ULEZ advert and will be appealing this decision.
“Due to the complex nature of the proposals, the advert was designed to capture the most important points and avoid confusing jargon. It gave an overview of the plans, and encouraged people to visit our website for more information and to take part in a full public consultation,” she said.
CO2 is greenhouse gas rather than a legal pollutant, she added.
Clean Air in London also complained about two other aspects of the advertisement, but the ASA did not uphold these complaints.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.
Over two million hectares of Brazilian rainforest could be legally converted to supply the UK with soy under a new anti-deforestation law proposed by the government, the WWF has found.
In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).
In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.