The Big Question: What are the challenges and opportunities of transposing the EU environmental acquis into UK law?

27th October 2017


P28 big q

Author

IEMA

Martin Baxter, Chief policy advisor at IEMA

“Any deviation will shove the burden onto regulators, businesses and professionals”

What we need right now is certainty. The UK has been without comfortable levels of certainty for well over a year and this limits businesses’ ability to plan and perform for the long term.

Not knowing which way the legislative and regulatory wind will blow creates business risk, and, because big organisations can choose where in the world they conduct their business, the lack of long-term clarity could lead them to take their investment elsewhere.

Legislative uncertainty also affects the UK’s ability to meet targets. The Environment Agency has an enormous role to fulfil in protecting and enhancing the UK’s environment every day, but that is currently severely hampered without long-term certainty.

While transposing the environmental acquis is an administrative challenge, it starts and ends with government. Any deviation from this framework will shove the burden and bureaucracy onto regulators, businesses and professionals responsible for environment and sustainability performance.

Having said that, sustainability professionals should have the chance to highlight areas for improvement – but only once we’ve established a baseline.

Transposition is both a challenge and an opportunity, and one we should get on with – quickly!

Sharon Lashley, Director of Enviro UK, Consultants Ltd

“We need to grow our networks and ensure our voice is heard”

As one of the many environment and sustainability professionals delivering projects at grass-roots level every day, I can say there will undeniably be both challenges and opportunities.

The core principles detailed in IEMA’s Brexit and Beyond guidelines underpin our standard delivery plan and a lot of the legislation will and absolutely should remain. But this presents those who deliver policies and regulators such as the Environment Agency an opportunity to finetune some of the legislative areas.

It is crucial that the environmental sector is included in these discussions, and that there is transparency, scrutiny and accountability. More important, there needs to be a focus on working with other agencies to ensure that we are stronger in our representation, that we can grow our networks and that our voice is heard in government.

We absolutely must continue to lead our profession, manage the risks and opportunities of transposition, collaborate with and involve other interested parties, set realistic SMART targets and objectives and be able to monitor and continuously improve.

We inevitably face challenging times, but if we continue to work to our IEMA Brexit and Beyond guidelines and encourage other sectors to recognise these principles, we can not only retain key strategies and legislation but reshape some areas for future improvement.

Prof Andy Jordan

Co-chair of the ESRC-funded Brexit & Environment network

“The risk of slippages and oversights is very real” The referendum and subsequent election have already opened up new political opportunities, in the form of an energetic new secretary of state. Although it sided with the losing side in the referendum, the environmental movement has wisely opted to look forwards. Brexit gives space for new agriculture and fisheries policies. But it also brings huge challenges, the full magnitude of which will become clearer as the Withdrawal Bill inches through.

First, there is so very much to get right. The acquis has many different working parts, including law and policy but also institutions and governance. Second, the legal process of transposition – a highly exacting task – will have to be completed at break-neck speed in London, Belfast, Cardiff and Edinburgh. The risk of slippages and oversights is very real.

Third is acute political uncertainty. The two main political parties can’t agree on a timetable let alone a destination, and that is before the EU 27 and the European Parliament have fully entered the process.

Fourth, environment, fisheries and agriculture are devolved matters. New institutions are needed to deliver common policy frameworks – in a climate of deep political distrust. This may require new levels of flexibility, such as common approaches for all of Ireland.

Unfortunately, deep, comprehensive trade agreements will be no more straightforward to explain to the public than ‘Brussels’.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Facing the climate emergency challenge in local government

It’s well recognised that the public sector has the opportunity to work towards a national net-zero landscape that goes well beyond improving on its own performance; it can also influence through procurement and can direct through policy.

19th March 2024

Read more

Dr Julie Riggs issues a call to arms to tackle a modern-day human tragedy

15th March 2024

Read more

Disgraced environmental consultant Peter Lovebrother is another month nearer retirement…

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

Multinational corporations are undermining their net-zero commitments with excessive air travel and no plans to reduce ‘the low hanging fruit’ of carbon footprints, a study by Transport & Environment has found.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s climate adaptation plans are ‘inadequate’ and falling ‘far short’ of what is required, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) has warned today.

13th March 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close