The benefits of socioeconomic papers in EIA

23rd December 2014


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Management

Author

Alexandra Saponja

Spawforths advocates incorporating impacts on local populations into assessments

The EIA Regulations 2011 implement the EU directive “on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment”. The inclusion of the word “population” in Schedule 4 of the regulations suggests an EIA should consider possible impacts on humans.

Annex III of the directive identifies selection criteria referred to in article 4(3) and identifies that the environmental sensitivity of geographical areas likely to be affected by projects must be considered, including densely populated areas.

The directive also identifies that “the effects of a project on the environment should be assessed in order to take account of concerns to protect human health, to contribute by means of a better environment to the quality of life, to ensure maintenance of the diversity of species and to maintain the reproductive capacity of the ecosystem as a basic resource for life”.

Article 3 of the Directive notes the EIA “shall identify, describe and assess in an appropriate manner, in the light of each individual case and in accordance with Articles 4 to 12, the direct and indirect effects of a project on human beings, fauna and flora”.

The guidance is clear that the impact on human beings is an area which should be assessed as part of EIA. Whilst this is clearly not related to flora or fauna and the protection of the environment which past EIA have tended to focus upon there are many areas of overlap and interaction of effects between humans, flora and fauna which should be considered.

Assessing socioeconomic effects in an EIA can include the assessment of the development proposals’ effect on the local community and the environment in which they live.

The assessment of a project’s impact on the local community can flag up both positive and adverse effects. For the latter, appropriate mitigation can be found and integrated into a scheme resulting in positive impacts for a community.

The guidance is not clear to what extent impacts should be assessed, so it is important to agree and identify factors to be assessed at the scoping stage with the relevant authority. During this stage the establishment of an agreed methodology for testing is also recommended. Potential environmental impacts which might be considered for a Schedule 2 development include:
• population/demographics
• transport
• economic growth/employment
• housing
• retail/leisure
• community infrastructure
• quality of life indicators
• non-quantifiable impacts.

There is often a large overlap between socioeconomic effects and other technical areas such as transport, noise and visual impacts, but these interrelationships are often not captured in reports and often missed. These effects are considered equally important as they directly and indirectly impact upon the local community and wider population. The benefit of a technical paper allows those elements which can often be missed by other technical areas to be assessed and tested.

The benefits therefore of including a socioeconomic technical paper in environmental statements are as follows:
• consideration of the local community which historically has not been a key part of testing and assessment.

• understanding of the level of impact on local services and need to address any adverse impacts through mitigation.

• understanding the type of jobs which might be made available during both the construction and operational phase
• a robust assessment of interaction of effects which may not otherwise be considered: relationship between the local population and the local highways network, the effect on the local community during the construction phase, impact on or loss of services as a result of development.

• a more robust assessment for the planning authority to make their decision and balances the effects of a project on human beings, fauna and flora.

Further guidance is required from the government regarding socioeconomic impacts in EIA but current guidance recognises that impacts relating to the human population should be assessed and tested.

Spawforths is an independent planning consultancy.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close