QMark: The semantics of terminology and cultural heritage

14th February 2017


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Built environment ,
  • Planning ,
  • Management

Author

Nicola Tremayne

Tim Malim, technical director of archaeology and heritage at SLR Consulting, considers the increasing amount of work that needs to go into ensuring quality in assessments of archaeology or cultural heritage.

Many environmental statements (ES) include a chapter on archaeology or cultural heritage, but the scope and detail of these chapters can vary widely. If the ES is then part of evidence which might lead to cross-examination at public inquiry, inadequacies in the baseline and assessment can result in a loss at appeal. It is therefore of real importance to applicants and their EIA coordinators that an appropriate remit is agreed in advance so that the ES chapter reaches the correct quality standard.

Article 3 in the European Directive 2011/92/EU states: ‘The environmental impact assessment shall identify, describe and assess in an appropriate manner...the direct and indirect effects of a project on the following factors: (c) material assets and cultural heritage”.

Annex IV of the directive suggests a narrower definition: ‘A description of the aspects of the environment likely to be significantly affected by the proposed project, including, in particular, population, fauna, flora, soil, water, air, climatic factors, material assets, including the architectural and archaeological heritage, landscape and the interrelationship between the above factors.’

The latter definition is what has been included verbatim in the EIA regulations 2011 (Statutory Instrument 1824 for England and Wales) Part 1, whilst within schedule 3 the following requirement is added: ‘The environmental sensitivity of geographical areas likely to be affected by development must be considered, having regard, in particular, to (viii) landscapes of historical, cultural or archaeological significance.’

Cultural heritage is defined by UNESCO in article 2 of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003) as: ‘The practices, representations, expressions, knowledge, skills – as well as the instruments, objects, artefacts and cultural spaces associated therewith – that communities, groups and, in some cases, individuals recognise as part of their cultural heritage … and provides them with a sense of identity and continuity, thus promoting respect for cultural diversity and human creativity”.

This definition was developed from UNESCO’s medium term plan 1990-1995 (UNESCO, 25 C/4, 1989, p.57) which stated: “The idea of the heritage has now been broadened to include both the human and the natural environment, both architectural complexes and archaeological sites, not only the rural heritage and the countryside but also the urban, technical or industrial heritage, industrial design and street furniture.

‘Furthermore, the preservation of the cultural heritage now covers the non-physical cultural heritage, which includes the signs and symbols passed on by oral transmission, artistic and literary forms of expression, languages, ways of life, myths, beliefs and rituals, value systems and traditional knowledge and know-how.’

In spite of the use of cultural heritage terminology, in effect most EIAs focus on the legislative framework and planning policy guidance relevant within the constituent parts of the UK, which has employed terminology such as ‘historic environment’, ‘designated heritage assets’, ‘heritage assets’, ‘heritage significance’ and ‘the contribution of setting to heritage significance’.

The most contentious part of a chapter on ‘cultural heritage’ is often the assessment of potential impact on the setting of designated heritage assets, in particular listed buildings and scheduled monuments.

Although heritage regulators at national agency and local government level are often inexperienced in evaluating many of these complex issues, guidance has been produced in England and Scotland.

In addition to policy guidance, there is also the statutory duty to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the setting of a listed building (in England and Wales Section 66 (1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, and in Scotland Section 59 (1) Chapter VI, Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997).

Although this is a requirement placed on the decision-maker (the local planning authority or inspector/reporter), it effectively needs to be robustly considered as part of any EIA so that the potential for challenge is reduced, and the decision-maker can be confident that the statutory duty has been addressed through the evidence presented in the ES chapter.

In conclusion, experience has demonstrated that although ES chapters which only examine archaeological matters, and separate studies which address the historic built environment, might have been acceptable in the past, in future such minimalist approaches to EIA on cultural heritage run the risk of proving unacceptable when tested by a decision-maker. Establishing what is of heritage significance, and what within the setting contributes to heritage significance, is of the utmost importance for delivery of a robust and defensible ES chapter.

The scale of work required to achieve a best practice standard for a cultural heritage EIA study has grown substantially over the past few years as the wider remit required for heritage within the EIA process has been exposed to judicial review and public inquiry. Many heritage studies now need to be similar to landscape and visual impact assessments in the level of input, spatial analysis, and modelling in order to complete an EIA to a high enough level that it can pass the test of public scrutiny and cross-examination.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Advice note on health impact assessments

An advice note on health impact assessments and health in environmental assessments is set to be published by IEMA soon.

31st May 2024

Read more

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close