Permission for shale gas sites should be refused, planners say

21st January 2015

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Energy ,
  • Business & Industry ,
  • Noise ,
  • Air ,
  • Pollution & Waste Management


Sibylle Frey

Planning officers at Lancashire County Council have recommended that applications for shale gas exploration be refused due to the predicted increase in noise pollution and traffic.

Shale gas operator Cuadrilla had proposed two exploration and fracking sites in Lancashire, at Preston New Road and Roseacre Wood.

The Environment Agency had granted an environmental permit for operations at Preston New Road and was "minded to approve" those at Roseacre Wood.

Noise assessments commissioned by the county council found that existing background noise at both sites was lower than that given by Cuadrilla, meaning that its operations would lead to a greater increase in noise levels than that predicted by the applicant, according to the planning officers' reports for both sites.

This would have “significant adverse effects on the health and quality of life, and lead to an unacceptable loss of residential amenity to those residents at the nearest residential properties,” the reports state.

The application at Roseacre Wood was also recommended for refusal due to its impact on traffic, which planners judged to be “severe”, particularly that of HGVs on small rural roads.

Planning officers also judged that Cuadrilla’s proposals would have other negative effects, including air quality, greenhouse-gas emissions, ecology, landscape, waste and water resources, but said that these would be low or could be mitigated by planning conditions.

Planning officers dismissed objections based on opposition to the principle of shale gas exploration. The report states: “While it is recognised that a number of groups and individuals oppose the continued reliance on hydrocarbons as a primary energy resource and more particularly the principle and nature of shale gas exploration and appraisal in view of the potential harm and irreversible damage and ground contamination it could potentially cause, it is considered that these concerns cannot be supported and they would not constitute a sustainable reason for refusing the proposal.”

A spokesperson for Cuadrilla said: “After an extraordinarily lengthy period of consultation and review of around seven months we are surprised that, at this late point, the planning team at Lancashire County Council has raised objections about background noise for both sites.

“We believe, supported by independent experts Arup, that we have come forward with measures that would mitigate the noise of drilling and fracturing and the proposed noise levels are within the limits set out in government guidance,” he added.

Ken Cronin, chief executive of trade group UKOOG, called the planners’ decision “disappointing”. “The grounds for refusal are local planning matters specific to these sites rather than any issues that would have an obvious impact on other shale gas applications. I am pleased that the report concluded that the concerns raised by environmental groups have been addressed.”

Friends of the Earth’s North West campaigner Helen Rimmer said she was delighted with the planning officers’ recommendation, adding that councillors should reject the application when they meet next Wednesday.

“Only by doing so will they ensure that fracking is not allowed to cause further climate change while also putting communities and the local environment at risk,” she said.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

IEMA reviews political party manifestos

Ahead of the UK general election next month, IEMA has analysed the Labour, Conservative, Liberal Democrat, and Green Party manifestos in relation to the sustainability agenda.

19th June 2024

Read more

Nine in 10 UK adults do not fully trust brands to accurately portray their climate commitments or follow the science all the time, a new survey has uncovered.

19th June 2024

Read more

Just one in 20 workers aged 27 and under have the skills needed to help drive the net-zero transition, compared with one in eight of the workforce as a whole, new LinkedIn data suggests.

18th June 2024

Read more

Consumers are flexing their purchasing power in support of more sustainable products and services. Dr Andrew Coburn, CEO of sustainability intelligence and analytics firm, Risilience, considers the risk of greenwashing and sets out three key steps businesses can take to avoid the pitfalls and meet the opportunities of changing consumer demand.

18th June 2024

Read more

With a Taskforce on Inequality and Social-related Financial Disclosures in the pipeline, Beth Knight talks to Chris Seekings about increased recognition of social sustainability

6th June 2024

Read more

While biodiversity net gain is now making inroads, marine net gain is still in its infancy. Ed Walker explores the balance between enabling development and safeguarding our marine environment

6th June 2024

Read more

David Symons, FIEMA, director of sustainability at WSP, and IEMA’s Lesley Wilson, tell Chris Seekings why a growing number of organisations are turning to nature-based solutions to meet their climate goals

6th June 2024

Read more

Sarah Spencer on the clear case for stronger partnerships between farmers and renewable energy developers

6th June 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close