Making energy choices

18th January 2016

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Generation ,
  • Fossil fuels ,
  • Nuclear ,
  • Renewable


Emily Ghedia

The new feed-in tariffs (FITs) for solar and wind is a cut of nly63% instead of the 91% originally proposed.

There is no doubt, however, that the new subsidy levels for renewable deployment will severely damage roll-out. The government is justifying the cut on the ground that subsidies should not be in perpetuity. With solar and onshore wind close to market parity in terms of cost per hour of electricity produced and with money for subsidies tight, it is as well that the industries do without significant subsidy now rather than later.

I can buy part of that argument. It always was the case that FITs were supposed to fall as costs for technologies came down. Solar panel prices have nosedived in recent years, and arguably the initial tariffs were set too high, but a more sensible continuing tariff degression would keep in line with this initial understanding, while not terminally frightening off investors and installers.

The part I don’t buy is the selectivity being levelled at renewables under the guise of the “stand on your own feet” argument. The truth is that pretty much all forms of energy are subsidised, and largely not on a degressing basis. The planned nuclear power station at Hinkley Point in Somerset will receive around £24 billion over 35 years. In the same week as the cuts to FITs were announced, the government held a second capacity auction – intended to ensure that power stations will be available to provide electricity when required. They will be subsidised to do this and be able to keep the profit from the power produced. Gas-fired and coal-fired power stations as well as existing nuclear power plants all will receive substantial standby payments.

I can also buy part of the argument for capacity auctions: paying to keep plants online makes sense. But the deployment of renewables – which generally can be faster than building large, conventional power plants – also contributes to keeping that capacity gap open. To tell one sector it must do without subsidy while another receives money betrays where the government’s energy priorities lie, rather than acting as a sound argument about subsidies. So the other truth right now is that in effect you pay your subsidy and you take your choice: and the choice of the government’s energy policy is to not prioritise renewable and low-carbon energy.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Is the sea big enough?

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

The UK’s major cities lag well behind their European counterparts in terms of public transport use. Linking development to transport routes might be the answer, argues Huw Morris

3rd April 2024

Read more

Tom Harris examines the supply chain constraints facing the growing number of interconnector projects

2nd April 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

A consortium including IEMA and the Good Homes Alliance have drafted a letter to UK government ministers expressing disappointment with the proposed Future Homes Standard.

26th February 2024

Read more

Global corporations such as Amazon and Google purchased a record 46 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind energy last year, according to BloombergNEF (BNEF).

13th February 2024

Read more

Three-quarters of UK adults are concerned about the impact that climate change will have on their bills, according to polling commissioned by Positive Money.

13th February 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close