In court: June 2016

13th June 2016

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Manufacturing ,
  • Other ,
  • Transport ,
  • Waste


Martin Baxter

A round-up of the latest environmental legal cases including Yorkshire Water and Ward Recycling.

Yorkshire Water fined a record £1.1m for pollution incident

Leeds Crown Court has fined Yorkshire Water a record £1.1m for illegally discharging sewage that polluted the River Ouse near York.

The firm pleaded guilty to three environmental offences relating to the operation of its Naburn treatment works in Fulford. Problems at the site were identified first in August 2013, when officers from the Environment Agency carrying out a routine monitoring survey spotted effluent being discharged from the works into the Ouse. An investigation discovered that the discharge had been caused by the failure of a pump.

Three pumps are required to cope with the volume of sewage passing through the works. However, the backup had not been operational for five months, which was a breach of the site’s environmental permit. With just two pumps working, around 6,000 cu m of sewage flowed into emergency storage tanks, before overflowing through an old outfall into the river. The agency said the pollution damaged water quality for up to 1 km.

Agency officers who inspected the works 13 months later found that the backup pump had been taken away for repair and had not been replaced.

Judge Guy Kearl QC said: ‘The inability of a company with an annual turnover of £1bn to keep in its stores a replacement pump and spares, in the knowledge of the extended lead-in time for replacement parts and pumps plainly amounts to a reckless failure to put into place a system which could reasonably be expected to avoid the commission of the offence.’

Mike Riby, environment management team leader at the agency, said: ‘Water companies have a legal duty to ensure that their operations do not pose a threat to the environment. In this case, Yorkshire Water failed to have in place appropriate pumping equipment needed to process sewage at its Naburn treatment works.’

Yorkshire Water said that since April 2015 it had been operating a distribution centre to supply spare equipment and parts so that it could replace and repair broken pumps.

Leeds Crown Court also ordered the company to pay £27,073 costs. In January, Yorkshire Water was fined £600,000 by the same court for a water discharge in October 2013, which polluted a lake with sewage at Walton Colliery Nature Park, Wakefield, and killed hundreds of fish.

£370,000 penalty for waste offences

The owner of waste company Ward Recycling, has been fined £270,000 for persistent breaches of environmental permits at two sites in Derbyshire, and for illegally operating at another site in the county. Derby Crown Court also ordered Donald Ward to pay prosecution costs of £100,000. The fines included costs avoided by the company of £40,000.

The court was told that between March 2012 and June 2013 the company had failed to operate properly its two permitted sites. This resulted in fly infestation at the Griffon Road site, while the quantities of waste stored at Hallam Fields posed a fire risk. Meanwhile, waste, including redox fines and fragmentiser fluff, was stored at Old Stanton Iron works without appropriate permits or in accordance with exemptions.

Ward pleaded guilty to three offences under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations.

Ford Mexico fined $1.05m

Mexico’s Federal Attorney for Environmental Protection, Profepa, has fined US automotive company Ford just over 18 million pesos ($1.05m) for selling vehicles in the country without proper environmental certificates.

Profepa said 4,690 vehicles sold by Ford were missing 12 compliance certificates relating to gas emissions and noise levels. It said the fine, imposed under the General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection, was for each certificate that was not obtained before Ford and Lincoln brand vehicles (model years 2015 and 2016) were imported and marketed in Mexico.

In a statement, Ford Mexico said the vehicles met Mexican emissions standards and that penalty was due to it not obtaining the emissions certificates in time. It added that procedures had been updated since to prevent a re-occurrence.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

SBTi clarifies that ‘no change has been made’ to its stance on offsetting

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

Senior consultant, EcoAct

3rd April 2024

Read more

Around 20% of the plastic recycled is polypropylene, but the diversity of products it protects has prevented safe reprocessing back into food packaging. Until now. David Burrows reports

3rd April 2024

Read more

IEMA presents a digital campaign to share knowledge and inspire action in sustainability

2nd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close