Exxon underestimating risks of climate action to its business, according to finance analysts

12th September 2014

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Energy ,
  • Conventional ,
  • Mitigation


James Heffron

ExxonMobil is underperforming on the stockmarket due to a business model which sees it investing in high-risk, low-return projects such as oil sands, according to finance risk experts the Carbon Tracker Initiative (CTI).

The CTI was responding to a report a published by ExxonMobil earlier this year.

This aimed to reassure investors that the company was managing climate-related risk after shareholders Arjuna Capital and As You Sow raised concerns that oil giant’s carbon assets would become stranded due to global action on climate change.

In its report, ExxonMobil rebuffed criticism that its hydrocarbon reserves will become stranded.

“We believe producing these assets is essential to meeting growing energy demand worldwide, and in preventing consumers – especially those in the least developed and most vulnerable economies – from themselves becoming stranded in the global pursuit of higher living standards and greater economic opportunity,” it said.

However, in its response, the CTI claims that ExxonMobil has lost its previous market leadership and lagged behind competitors over the past five years, despite oil prices remaining high.

The CTI acknowledges that there have been industry-wide trends, such as rising costs and fiscal changes that have affected ExxonMobil, but says the firm’s performance also reflects its choice to invest more in capital-intensive, low-return projects including tar sands, heavy oil and arctic developments.

In 2007, such projects accounted for 7.5% of ExxonMobil’s proven gas and oil reserves and around 15% of its liquid reserves.

However, the CTI points out that, by the end of 2013, this had risen to 17% and 32% respectively, while conventional projects fell from 45% to 33% of total proven reserves.

Paul Spedding, lead analyst of the CTI report, said: "Continuing to invest in high-cost, high-carbon investments could pressure future returns and - just as important – increase ExxonMobil's operational gearing to the potential consequences of action on carbon, including higher environmental costs and downward pressure on oil prices. Maybe it is time to consider a "shrink-to-grow" strategy?"

ExxonMobil’s definition of stranded assets is very narrow, essentially taking it to mean “unburnable” and referring to proven reserves only, the CTI argues.

It believes that ExxonMobil should adopt a definition that includes the potential for investments to become uneconomic due to changing market and regulatory forces, including lower future oil prices.

“Any one or combination of these factors could result in previously sunk costs never being fully recovered and/or projects delivering an unacceptably low return to shareholders,” the CTI report states.

ExxonMobil did not respond to a request for comment.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

How much is too much?

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

Ben Goodwin reflects on policy, practice and advocacy over the past year

2nd April 2024

Read more

In 2020, IEMA and the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) jointly wrote and published A User Guide to Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. This has now been updated to include three key developments in the field.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Hello and welcome to another edition of Transform. I hope that you’ve had a good and productive few months so far.

28th March 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close