ETS rules increase cement emissions, warns think-tank

7th April 2016

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Reporting ,
  • Carbon Trading ,
  • Business & Industry ,
  • Manufacturing


Matthew Birchmore

The rules on the free allocation of EU emissions trading system allowances have created perverse incentives, resulting in the cement sector emitting more carbon than if it were outside the scheme, according to climate think-tank Sandbag.

The rules on the free allocation of EU emissions trading system allowances have created perverse incentives, resulting in the cement sector emitting more carbon than if it were outside the scheme, according to climate think-tank Sandbag.

Its latest report reveals that the rules, under which producers lose 50% of their free allocation if they generate less than 50% of their historic activity levels, had led the cement sector to over-produce clinker to avoid losing millions of euros worth of allowances. Clinker is an intermediary material in the cement-making process, but has a very high carbon intensity.

Sandbag claimed the sector emitted an extra 15 million tonnes of carbon in 2013 and said emissions would be lower if it were outside the ETS. The think-tank also warned that low-efficiency producers were benefiting at the expense of their more efficient competitors. According to the report, low-efficiency cement kilns produced 20 million tonnes of clinker in 2013, even though there were nearly 50 million tonnes of unused capacity among high-efficiency kilns.

Cembureau, the trade body for the European cement industry, reacted angrily to the report, claiming it contained factual errors and wrong numbers. ‘The allegations that the ETS has incentivised overproduction are based on thin air and do not acknowledge the strides the cement sector has made through investments in the reduction of its carbon dioxide emissions,’ said the association.

A separate study by consultancy CE Delft has found that European industry made more than €8bn in additional profits from the overallocation of ETS allowances between 2008 and 2014. The Dutch-based firm calculated the profits for 15 sectors in 19 countries. It found that Spain had the highest profits, totalling more than €1.6bn, while about one-third of allowances in Sweden were issued in excess of verified emissions. It also found almost all sectors in the UK participating in the ETS had profited from over-allocation of allowances.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

UK’s net-zero economy grows by 9%

The UK’s net-zero economy grew 9% last year while delivering higher paid jobs than average and attracting billions of pounds in private investment, analysis by CBI Economics has uncovered.

28th February 2024

Read more

IEMA and the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) have today published up-to-date guidance to help companies and individuals understand climate-related financial information.

22nd February 2024

Read more

Global corporations such as Amazon and Google purchased a record 46 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind energy last year, according to BloombergNEF (BNEF).

13th February 2024

Read more

Three-quarters of UK adults are concerned about the impact that climate change will have on their bills, according to polling commissioned by Positive Money.

13th February 2024

Read more

Tom Pashby reviews Anna Trompetas’s OffSet, a dystopian climate fiction novel that explores questions of morality, motherhood and class inequality

1st February 2024

Read more

Almost 100 global companies have signed up to the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) First Movers Coalition, which aims to transform the supply chains across high-emitting sectors.

24th January 2024

Read more

Up to three quarters of the global building industry’s emissions could be slashed if the engineering and construction sectors embedded circular economy principles in their operations, according to a major report.

18th January 2024

Read more

Matt Tompsett looks beyond tree planting to the pros and cons of land and sea-based carbon sequestration projects.

15th January 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close