Defra data scale back could inhibit action on climate change

30th March 2016


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Adaptation ,
  • Mitigation ,
  • Reporting ,
  • Business & Industry

Author

Joan Isus

Plans to scale back collection of data by the environment department (Defra) could damage the UK's ability to meet carbon emission reduction targets, the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) said.

Defra is planning to close or reduce the frequency of several datasets covering farming; food; air quality and emissions; environmental protection; waste, recycling and resources; water quality and abstraction; forestry; animal and plant health; flooding and biodiversity. A consultation on the proposals closed last week.

It states that the vast majority of changes proposed are to agricultural statistics, with only limited alterations expected in forestry, fishing, and animal and plant health.

In its response to the consultation, the CCC highlighted the higher uncertainties over agricultural data than for other sectors covered by the National Atmospheric Emission Inventory (the NAEI), which the government uses to estimate and report on annual emissions.

This makes it even more important to have sources of good quality data against which to assess progress in reducing emissions, the CCC said.

The committee also said changing or scrapping the collection of certain datasets could also damage the agricultural industry’s ability to track the progress of its greenhouse gas (GHG) action plan, which includes a commitment to reduce emissions in England by 3 MtCO2e by 2020.

The CCC is particularly concerned with proposals on four datasets:

  • British survey of fertiliser practice (BSFP) – This captures the application of organic and inorganic fertiliser, which makes up a significant source of nitrous oxide emissions in agriculture (around 44% in 2013). Defra is proposing to scale back the survey to ‘essential items’ and review the sample size, but the CCC said this would reduce the ability to monitor progress in reducing nitrous oxide emissions through improvements in fertiliser use efficiency.
  • Farm practices survey (FPS) – This focuses on practices relating to GHG mitigation. Defra is proposing to conduct the survey every four years instead of annually. The committee said the frequency change would severely restrict Defra’s ability to develop cost-effective, well-targeted policies and its own ability to review progress.
  • Agriculture in the UK – Proposed changes to the format and scope of this dataset could hinder an understanding of the drivers of emissions in agriculture, the CCC said. It provided the example of the data related to agricultural output and area of land use, which it uses together with emissions data to understand how emissions intensity of output changes over time.
  • Agricultural statistics and climate change – Proposed changes to the content and frequency of the report could weaken the ability of Defra, the CCC said, adding that this would hinder its ability to effectively monitor progress against the ten GHG indicators that the environment department established in 2012.

In a letter to Defra, Matthew Bell, chief executive of the CCC, noted that agricultural emissions currently account for around 10% of total UK emissions, and that this share could be expected to increase as other sectors decarbonise more quickly.

‘Deeper reductions in agricultural emissions than those seen to date will be required in order to contribute to statutory emission reduction targets. The requirement to have robust data will become even more important in order to ensure cost-effective policies that support UK agriculture can be put in place and to adequately monitor farming practices and impact on emissions,’ he wrote.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

SBTi clarifies that ‘no change has been made’ to its stance on offsetting

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

Ben Goodwin reflects on policy, practice and advocacy over the past year

2nd April 2024

Read more

In 2020, IEMA and the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) jointly wrote and published A User Guide to Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. This has now been updated to include three key developments in the field.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close