Death to 1,000 cuts

6th May 2014


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Management ,
  • Corporate governance ,
  • EMS


Benjamin Jenkins

Richard Walsh argues that problems with regulation tend to arise because rules are often poorly understood, rather than "red tape"

Government cuts are nothing new, but for some the term “austerity measures” has become part of their daily vocabulary. Despite recent signs of recovery, the chancellor, George Osborne, remains convinced that further public spending cuts are necessary and, yet again, Defra is in the firing line.

The environment department is one of the smallest in government, but has faced some of the most substantial financial cuts in recent years. Since 2010, Defra’s budget has been slashed by £500 million and it must find a further £300 million of savings by 2016.

As a result, the Environment Agency, which is funded by Defra, is in the process of shedding 15% of its staff and is facing its most challenging time in its near 20-year history. Its workforce will shrink from 11,400 to just 9,700. Paul Leinster, the agency’s chief executive, expects the most significant cuts to be felt in the environment and business division, which is responsible for regulating and enforcement activities and is set to lose 34% of its funding.

Red tape challenge

The latest round of cuts came in January as David Cameron announced that his government would be the first in history to end a term in office with less regulation on the statute books than when it came to power. Cameron declared that he wanted to “get out of the way of small business success” and “celebrate enterprise and risk takers”. In the same speech, the prime minister proudly declared that Defra would delete 80,000 pages of guidance by March, claiming that such a move would save businesses around £100 million a year.

Cameron’s speech echoed the words of former environment secretary Caroline Spelman in March 2012, when she announced the results of the environment regulation element of the government’s red tape challenge. Back then the claim from the government was that environmental rules would be made “more effective while remaining as strong as ever”.

It was stated that the changes would save businesses more than £1 billion over five years and protect the environment by being cheaper and easier for companies to follow. Spelman was keen to point out that cutting red tape was “not about rolling back environmental safeguards”, but about upholding environmental protection and removing unnecessary bureaucracy.

I cannot help but think that all the fanfare around getting rid of bureaucracy is simply a nice way of packaging the implications, whether positive or negative, of tightened budgets.

Step forward self-regulation

The recent changes to legislation and budgets have resulted in more emphasis being placed on self-regulation. This is not the best route forward. I have not known a time when there has been so little new legislation published. In my opinion, the majority of existing regulations are not preventing businesses from succeeding, but are let down by a lack of education and understanding of the law.

Last year, the requirement for construction site waste management plans (SWMP) was abolished. Since 2008, contractors embarking on construction projects in England costing more than £300,000 had been required to implement an SWMP detailing how they proposed to handle the waste the site would generate before starting work.

The plans ensured that all construction site waste was disposed of in the correct manner following best practice guidelines. Many contractors argued that SWMPs were a waste of time and money and that it would be best if they were allowed to self-regulate. It’s difficult to believe that all construction companies will voluntarily follow best practice; after all, it’s human nature to do things in the simplest way. If contractors are looking to cut costs, or even corners, it will now be easier for them to look for savings in their waste strategies.

The only way this form of self-regulation will work is if contractors’ clients make effective waste management a contractual obligation and build it into ongoing reporting requirements for site managers. But this approach puts the onus firmly on the client rather than the contractor.

In need of guidance

It is commonplace for people to see any form of legislation as bureaucratic, especially if they find themselves swamped by paperwork. However, this feeling is usually due to a lack of understanding, which often results in them going about compliance in the wrong way. The now defunct SWMPs are a prime example of this. What the government and Defra should be looking at is offering better guidance and assistance to avoid excessive paperwork.

The government used to provide this guidance through the NetRegs website. NetRegs took legislation and turned it into plain English but, afterthe comprehensive spending review in 2010, it was decided that the site cost too much and it was taken offline.

At the time, all of the information on the site was supposed to be integrated with other guidance, such as that from Defra, and hosted on the centralised Business Link website. However, the result has never been as effective as the original NetRegs at being the first interface businesses have with environmental legislation. The environment regulators in Scotland and Northern Ireland still have a NetRegs site and its value is well recognised.

Many of my clients bemoan the removal of NetRegs more than anything else relating to environmental legislation. It was the link between them and the government, and was a gateway to the support they needed to manage the environmental impacts of their businesses effectively.

The private sector

As a result of the spending cuts and the red tape challenge, many companies now find themselves in a position where they want to do what is right for the environment, but have little guidance to follow. This has forced private industry to act in place of the regulators and assist firms, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, in understanding and implementing best practice.

Assessors who audit against ISO 14001, for example, are increasingly put under pressure by clients asking for consultancy and help in understanding and checking legislation on their behalf. For the self-proclaimed “greenest government ever”, it seems that any progress it intended to make has been firmly halted.

If companies are having problems with legislation, surely it makes more sense to help them understand it rather than remove it. It is like abolishing school tests that children find difficult and, rather than educate them, expect the pupils to teach themselves and set their own exams. The result is never going to be a classroom full of educated individuals. Similarly, companies are not going to be in a position to self-regulate if they are not guided by legislation or if they don’t have access to proper advice.

Header image source: istock


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Latest environmental legislation round-up

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Dr Julie Riggs issues a call to arms to tackle a modern-day human tragedy

15th March 2024

Read more

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

Campaign group Wild Justice has accused the UK government of trying to relax pollution rules for housebuilders “through the backdoor”.

14th February 2024

Read more

Digital tracking, packaging data delays and new collections provide a waste focus for this edition’s environmental round-up by legislation expert Neil Howe

28th November 2023

Read more

Environmental crimes could result in prison sentences of up to 10 years and company fines of 5% of turnover under a proposed EU law agreed by the European parliament and council.

21st November 2023

Read more

Stuart McLachlan and Dean Sanders discuss their book: The Adventure of Sustainable Performance: Beyond ESG Compliance to Leadership in the New Era.

14th November 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close