Costs limit application for individual in ‘Save the Northern Meadows’ group granted

26th May 2022


In R. (on the application of Lewis) v Welsh Ministers, following a costs order against the claimant, the claimant applied for a costs limit in accordance with the Aarhus Convention 2001 and the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) 1998/3132.

The defendant Welsh Ministers had approved the interested party’s outline case to build a new cancer centre on a site in Cardiff. The claimant was a member of ‘Save the Northern Meadows’, a group of citizens who wanted to protect the site from development.

The claimant had issued proceedings in her own name and sought to challenge the decision on three grounds, including a breach of the defendant’s duty to seek to maintain and enhance biodiversity

and related matters under the Environment (Wales) Act 2016. She was refused permission to seek judicial review and the court ordered that she should pay the defendant’s and interested party’s costs. She argued that she was entitled to a costs limit as the claim was an Aarhus Convention Claim within the meaning of the CPR 1998/3132.

CPR 1998/3132 sets out limits on the costs a claimant might be ordered to pay in an Aarhus Convention Claim, providing a limit of £5,000 where the claimant claims as an individual, not as or on behalf of a business or other legal persons. ‘Save the Northern Meadows’ was not a group with a defined membership structure, so the cost limit applied.

Under the CPR, a claimant who confirms that their claim is an Aarhus Convention Claim is required to file and serve a schedule setting out their significant assets, liabilities, income and expenditure, together with the aggregate amount of the financial support that has been and is likely to be provided by others. The claimant provided details of the amounts received on a crowdfunding site and indicated that her target was to raise a total of £35,000, the amount she could reasonably expect to receive from the public. The information she provided therefore met the CPR requirements.

The defendant argued that, of the three proposed grounds for judicial review, only one was potentially within the scope of the Convention. This was the one clearly alleging a breach of the Environment (Wales) Act 2016, which was provisions of national law relating to the environment and therefore in scope.

Nevertheless, the court was satisfied that the third ground had been included in the claim in good faith and not for any illegitimate purpose, so the cost limit applied and the application was granted.

Image credit | Alamy

Transform articles

Drinks giant fined for emissions breaches

Multinational drinks giant Diageo has been fined more than £1.2m by the Scottish government for breaches relating to the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS), despite having an appeal partially up-held.

26th May 2022

Read more

The Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) has today published its first monitoring report on the UK government’s 25 Year Environment Plan, warning that progress so far has been “slow”.

12th May 2022

Read more

US companies registered with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) could be forced to report the climate-related impacts of their business under plans announced by the regulator this week.

24th March 2022

Read more

In R. (on the application of Finch) v Surrey County Council, the appellant appealed against the dismissal of her judicial review claim. She sought review of the council planning authority’s decision to grant permission to expand an oil well site and drill four new oil wells.

24th March 2022

Read more

Yorkshire Water has agreed to pay £300,000 to Yorkshire Wildlife Trust following a sewage discharge incident in Leeds in 2018.

24th March 2022

Read more

Nearly 10,400 companies worldwide – worth $105trn (£80.4trn) in market capitalisation – will be asked to disclose environmental data by more than 680 financial institutions this year through CDP.

14th March 2022

Read more

In R. (on the application of RSPB) v Natural England, the RSPB and a nature conservation scientist appealed a Natural England decision to grant a licence to “take and disturb” hen harriers for scientific, research or educational purposes under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

27th January 2022

Read more

Thames Water Utilities Limited has been fined £4m for discharging half a million litres of sewage into Seacourt Stream and Hinksey Stream in Oxford over two days in July 2016.

27th January 2022

Read more

Tom Pashby reports from Glasgow

26th November 2021

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert