Companies set out metric to measure impact on biodiversity

22nd May 2017


Transform web

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Corporate governance ,
  • Management ,
  • Certification ,
  • Procurement

Author

Andrew Burwood

A network of businesses has unveiled a way for companies to calculate the impact of their supply chains on the natural environment which it hopes will improve decision-making and inform investors.

The metric has been developed by firms including Kering, Interserve, Mars and Asda. The firms are all members of the Natural Capital Impact Group (NCIG) and the Investment Leaders Group, an international network of investors.

‘Companies are starting to realise that they’re improving their impact on the natural environment, but they have no way of measuring this. This is important for investors, who have been asking questions about this issue,’ explained Gemma Cranston, director of the natural resources security portfolio at the University of Cambridge, which convenes the NCIG.

Despite government guidance and advice for companies wanting to reduce their impact on the natural environment, an appropriate way of measuring results did not exist, she said.

The metric should help companies identify where they have sufficient information, and where there are gaps, she added.

The group has so far focused on biodiversity, since it is the most complex issue, but is planning further work on soil and water.

Luxury and sportswear clothing brand Kering is piloting the metric. Head of sustainable sourcing innovation Helen Crowley described the test as ‘ground-truthing’ the metric against existing supply chain data.

She said Kering was already using environmental profit and loss accounting to understand its impacts on natural capital, but wanted more information to measure and mitigate impacts on biodiversity: ‘We recognise that there is a lot of information in academic and conservation sectors that isn’t getting to business. We’re tapping into that information and translating it into something business can use.’

Where a company finds problems in the environmental impact of raw materials in its supply chain, it can usually engage with suppliers and influence a change in production processes, such as asking them to become certified against a standard, she said. ‘I don’t think at this stage we would consider dropping a product [where problems are identified] as we can work with other companies in the supply chain to leverage change,’ Crowley said.

The NCIG has published a working paper, which details how the metric is constructed and provides insight into the impacts of business operations on biodiversity.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Eight in 10 of world’s cites report significant climate hazards

Climate hazards such as flooding, droughts and extreme heat are threatening eight in 10 of the world’s cities, new research from CDP has uncovered.

3rd July 2024

Read more

Ahead of the UK general election next month, IEMA has analysed the Labour, Conservative, Liberal Democrat, and Green Party manifestos in relation to the sustainability agenda.

19th June 2024

Read more

While biodiversity net gain is now making inroads, marine net gain is still in its infancy. Ed Walker explores the balance between enabling development and safeguarding our marine environment

6th June 2024

Read more

David Symons, FIEMA, director of sustainability at WSP, and IEMA’s Lesley Wilson, tell Chris Seekings why a growing number of organisations are turning to nature-based solutions to meet their climate goals

6th June 2024

Read more

Joe Nisbet explores the challenges and opportunities of delivering marine net gain through offshore renewables

31st May 2024

Read more

In January, the Welsh government consulted on a proposed white paper, 'Securing a Sustainable Future: Environmental Principles, Governance and Biodiversity Targets for a Greener Wales'.

31st May 2024

Read more

What is the role for nature in the Climate Change Act? Sophie Mairesse reports

20th May 2024

Read more

Gillian Gibson calls for urgent action to avoid environmental tipping points

20th May 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close