Circular economy package withdrawal confirmed

23rd January 2015


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Pollution & Waste Management ,
  • Air ,
  • EU ,
  • Recycling

Author

Kevin Kelly

A package of proposals on waste will be withdrawn and a new version submitted by the end of the year, the European commission confirmed yesterday.

The move had received widespread criticism from environment ministers, MEPs and environmental campaigners.

Last week, a majority of MEPs voted in favour of individual amendments opposing the withdrawal of the draft legislation, though they failed to agree on a joint resolution.

The commission says that the circular economy proposals will be replaced with a "new, more ambitious proposal" by the end of 2015. A spokesperson for the commission said: "There is fine-tuning to be made, but it remains an important piece of legislation - all member states agree that this idea of the circular economy is needed."

Jacob Hayler, executive director for waste trade body the Environmental Services Association (ESA) said: "This will delay the introduction of a clear policy framework beyond 2020 at European level, and the continuing uncertainty over future policy direction will discourage much-needed private sector investment in resource management infrastructure.

"Nevertheless ESA, and its European association FEAD, will continue to work closely with the commission, the parliament, and member states to help develop the 'more ambitious' circular economy package vice president Frans Timmermans has promised to re-table later this year," he said.

The new package should retain key elements of the existing proposals, while adding measures to prevent waste and strengthen the markets for recycled and recovered materials, he said.

Draft air quality legislation was also under threat of being dropped from the new commission's work programme. But Timmermans and environment commissioner Karmenu Vella have confirmed in meetings with the Conservative MEP and rapporteur on air quality, Julie Girling, that the commission will instead modify the proposals to improve synergy with the EU climate and energy package.


Transform articles

Landmark case against the Environment Agency

The claimants in Harris v Environment Agency applied for judicial review of the Agency’s refusal to expand the scope of an investigation into the effect of groundwater abstraction from wetland sites across the Norfolk Broads.

24th November 2022

Read more

Anglian Water has been fined £1,221,000 following two court cases relating to pollution incidents that occurred in 2019.

24th November 2022

Read more

Charlene Smith outlines how the environmental impact assessment process is implemented in Malta

21st September 2022

Read more

North Africa is a hotspot for climate change, and the challenges run deep. Huw Morris reports on a severely water-stressed region

21st September 2022

Read more

In R. (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the Secretary’s decisions to approve pro-posals and policies prepared under the Climate Change Act 2008, and to publish the government’s Net Zero Strategy to comply with his obligations.

21st September 2022

Read more

A Norfolk garage owner who repeatedly ignored Environment Agency warnings about storing end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) and parts has been jailed for six months.

21st September 2022

Read more

Embedding sustainability principles into business processes is becoming mainstream, but the term ‘sustainability’ is vulnerable to misuse.

21st September 2022

Read more

The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy recently consulted on proposals to strengthen and improve the Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme (ESOS), and has published its response and decisions.

21st September 2022

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert