An objective approach to human population impact assessment

9th March 2015


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Management

Author

Robert Lockwood

Andrew Burwood from Black and Veatch considers how the Northwich flood risk management scheme assesses impacts on the human population.

“Population” is the first aspect of the environment listed in Schedule 4, Part 1(3) of the 2011 EIA regulations. However, the human population chapter of environmental statements can often be limited to a summary of other impacts that also relate to humans, such as visual amenity, traffic and transport, but without a clear approach to assessing the significance of the development on human beings in their own right.

A lack of clarity over what is being assessed can lead to confusion about the difference between, for example, assessing effects on the operation of the transport network and assessing effects on human beings who live or work near affected roads. It can also result in repetition and apparent inconsistency between ES chapters.

More importantly, a lack of clarity over how the assessment is carried out can mean that a key component of an EIA, to identify which effects could be significant and therefore need mitigating, is not carried out effectively. This means the significance of effects may either be exaggerated or down-played if the assessment is not based on a clear, objective approach.

This means the significance of effects may either be exaggerated or down-played if the assessment is not based on a clear, objective approach.

This article uses the Environment Agency’s Northwich town centre flood risk management scheme as a case study of how a clear and objective human population assessment can be carried out.

Flood risk management schemes (FRMS) are designed to provide a benefit to the local population. However, FRMS are often within urban areas where construction work and the presence of flood defences can be intrusive. In addition, a river corridor through an urban area can provide an important community resource.

Defining receptors is an important stage in being able to identify potentially significant effects. A balance is needed between defining receptors as single points such as single properties which can lead to underestimation of total effects, and grouping too many together, which can lead to individual sensitivities being missed.

For the Northwich town centre FRMS, receptors were grouped into four categories: residential areas; commercial areas; community facilities such as a medical centre; and informal recreation areas such as open space and paths. Individual receptors were identified, assigned a category, and marked on a map. This allowed effects on key elements of the human environment to be considered at the whole scheme level, while allowing the characteristics of individual receptors to be taken into account.

Although all human beings can be considered sensitive, an objective approach is needed for EIA to identify members of a population, and facilities used by a community, that are particularly sensitive. As an example, for the Northwich FRMS the sensitivity of residential areas was defined based on census data, specifically the index of multiple deprivation (IMD) and the proportion of vulnerable residents, for example, elderly residents and residents with long-term health problems. Residential areas within the 10% most deprived in England, according to the IMD, were considered to be of high sensitivity. Residential areas among the 10-20% most deprived in England or within an area where more than 20% of residents are vulnerable, were considered as having moderate sensitivity.

This approach assumes that communities that are among the 20% most deprived in England are more sensitive to temporary and permanent changes than other communities. Residents may be more susceptible to the effects of noise, dust, visual disturbance and changes to access during construction as they are more likely to be at home during the day. They are also more likely to have access, mobility or resource limitations that could affect their ability to cope with the stress of disturbance.

Quantitative definitions of magnitude were also made. These were based on the number of properties, or the proportion of a particular type of amenity that could be affected by the scheme. This meant that for the Northwich FRMS, the assessment of significance, which is a combination of sensitivity and magnitude, was based on a clear and objective method, and that the findings of the assessment are auditable and can be readily justified. It also allows mitigation at the detailed design and construction stages to focus on the most vulnerable communities and most important facilities in order to minimise the impacts of delivering the scheme.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

EU and UK citizens fear net-zero delivery deficit

Support for net zero remains high across the UK and the EU, but the majority of citizens don't believe that major emitters and governments will reach their climate targets in time.

16th May 2024

Read more

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

Taxing the extraction of fossil fuels in the world’s most advanced economies could raise $720bn (£575bn) by 2030 to support vulnerable countries facing climate damages, analysis has found.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close