2°C temperature threshold puts oil investments at risk
- Mitigation ,
- Conventional ,
Shell says demand for fossil fuels will remain buoyant and continue to attract a high price.
Investment worth $1.1 trillion in oil projects are at risk up to 2025 if the increase in global temperatures is to be kept below the critical 2ºC threshold. Scientists believe that any rise greater than that caused by oil being being burned could trigger dangerous climate change.
The warning comes in a new report from financial specialists the Carbon Tracker Initiative (CTI). It says projects that require the price of a barrel of oil to be at least $95 over the next 10 years will be increasingly nonviable due to tougher climate policies and advances in vehicle technology, for example, that will cut demand for oil. Concern is raised mainly about projects that involve extracting unconventional types of hydrocarbons, such as shale oil and oil sands, or operating in physically-demanding environments, such as ultra deepwater and the Arctic. In his foreword to the report, CTI chief executive Anthony Hobley warns: “Either policy or technological tipping points will reduce demand … or we will face levels of warming described as catastrophic by many.”
The CTI has developed a “carbon supply cost curve” to identify the oil projects most at risk. Its analysis assumes that oil will have a 40% share of a carbon budget necessary to keep the temperature rise below 2ºC and builds on its previous work on “unburnable carbon”. Assuming this share remains constant, the CTI estimates that total emissions from the oil industry will be pegged at 360 giga tonnes of CO2, which is equivalent to 760 billion barrels of oil. If so, only oil that can be extracted for a market price of $75 per barrel or less will remain viable. To avoid wasted capital, the CTI advises investors to only finance projects at the low end of the cost curve. “There is a realisation that ignoring climate risk and hoping it will go away is no longer an acceptable risk management strategy for investment institutions,” writes Hobley.
The CTI research places Shell fourth – behind Petrobas, ExxonMobil and Rosneft – in its list of oil companies with the highest total capital expenditure exposure over the next 10 years in projects above the $95 per barrel market price. However, Shell does not believe any of its proven reserves will be non-performing or become “stranded assets”.
In a letter to stakeholders, Shell acknowledged the need to tackle climate change, but said: “Energy demand growth, in our view, will lead to fossil fuels continuing to play a major role in the energy system – accounting for 40–60% of energy supply in 2050 and beyond, for example. The huge investment required to provide energy is expected to require high energy prices, and not [a] drastic price drop.”
CTI responded: “Shell does not explain how it is solving the contradiction between the predictions of high oil demand and its acceptance of the need to address climate change. [We] argue that high-cost production and growing oil demand assumptions are inconsistent with a more resilient global economy and stable global climate.”
The House of Commons’ environmental audit committee warned in March that global financial markets were in danger of creating a “carbon bubble” due to the over-valuing of fossil fuel assets. “Financial stability could be threatened if shares in fossil fuel companies turn out to be overvalued because the bulk of their oil, coal and gas reserves cannot be burned without further destabilising the climate,” said Joan Walley, chair of the EAC.
The MPs said the government must ensure investors have all of the information they require to assess carbon risk.
Demand for fossil fuels will peak by 2025 if all national net-zero pledges are implemented in full and on time, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has forecast.
The Green Homes Grant is set to deliver only a fraction of the jobs and improvements intended, leading to calls for more involvement from local authorities in future schemes.
COVID-19 recovery packages have largely focused on protecting, rather than transforming, existing industries, and have been a “lost opportunity” for speeding up the global energy transition.
Half of the world's 40 largest listed oil and gas companies will have to slash their production by at least 50% by the 2030s to align with the goals of the Paris Agreement, new analysis has found.
None of England’s water and sewerage companies achieved all environmental expectations for the period 2015 to 2020, the Environment Agency has revealed. These targets included the reduction of total pollution incidents by at least one-third compared with 2012, and for incident self-reporting to be at least 75%.
The UK’s pipeline for renewable energy projects could mitigate 90% of job losses caused by COVID-19 and help deliver the government’s ‘levelling up’ agenda. That is according to a recent report from consultancy EY-Parthenon, which outlines how the UK’s £108bn “visible pipeline” of investible renewable energy projects could create 625,000 jobs.
Billions of people worldwide have been unable to access safe drinking water and sanitation in their homes during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a progress report from the World Health Organisation focusing on the UN’s sixth Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 6) – to “ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all by 2030”.