Mark Goodstein, executive director of the foundation's automobile prize, said the guidelines pose several problems, such as just how to measure efficiency.
The foundation is working on the basis of two assumptions, Goodstein said. 'One is that the technology exists today to give us an order of magnitude improvement in efficiency, however you measure it. The second is that the prize ought to be defined by the market.' Goodstein said one set of suggested rules would encourage groups to offer modifications to existing vehicles that would increase their fuel economy to 200mpg and cost less than $10,000 per car or truck. That figure is almost 10 times greater than the average fuel economy of a vehicle sold in the US last year.
Previous vehicles that have managed that target, such as a 2002 Volkswagen AG experimental vehicle that reached 264 miles to the gallon, thanks to a one-cylinder diesel engine. Goodstein, a dotcom entrepreneur, said the foundation was close to signing a sponsor that would provide the $25m prize. While such a figure is relatively small for major carmakers, Goodstein said there could be other rewards for the team that wins, such as investment from venture capital firms or manufacturing contracts. He said he was still getting in contact with several groups, including carmakers, and had received mostly positive feedback.
Posted on 21st March 2006
IEMA reacts to IPCC report: AR6 Climate Change 2021
- 9th August 2021
IEMA reacts to CCC Progress report to Parliament
- 24th June 2021
IEMA reacts to Climate Change Committee Report
- 15th June 2021
IEMA Reacts to Queen’s Speech
- 11th May 2021
Enhancing Scotland’s EIA Community - Scotland’s EIA Conference 2021 moves online
- 22nd April 2021
IEMA launches senior management briefing on how organisations can benefit from effective environmental auditing
- 29th March 2021