Researchers ran workshops in four Zimbabwean villages to inform farmers of the forecasts. Those that used the information to choose when and what to plant saw greater yields of crops such as maize.
Details are released in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. At the begining of their study in September 2000, the researchers, from Boston University in the US and the University of Zimbabwe in Harare, found a fair degree of scepticism among farmers about the value of weather forecasts.
During a series of workshops, they attempted to stimulate awareness of the potential benefits of using forecasts, and discussion on how farming practices could be changed to cope with abnormally wet or dry seasons. Coming into the 2002/2003 season, the scientists predicted a lower than average rainfall because of a mild El Niño event; and broadly, this proved to be correct.
The following season, the prediction was for a return to normal, which again turned out to be largely accurate. Just over half of the farmers - 57% - reported that they changed decisions on when and what to plant because of the forecasts, either planting at different times or choosing different varieties.
Subscribe
Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.
Posted on 23rd August 2005
Latest Posts
-
IEMA appoints two new Board Directors
- 28th March 2024 -
Impact Assessment Network Volunteers receive International Association of Impact Assessment (IAIA) Regional Award
- 20th March 2024 -
IEMA launches digital campaign to share knowledge and inspire action in sustainability
- 6th March 2024 -
IEMA comments on 2023 being hottest year on record
- 9th January 2024 -
IEMA reacts to COP28 agreement to transition away from fossil fuels
- 13th December 2023 -
New IEMA social sustainability steering group – express your interest in joining
- 24th November 2023