By rejecting the Commission's approach to municipal waste incinerators, the Visegrad Ministers recognise that the Commission's proposal is unacceptable. The classification of municipal waste incinerators as recovery facilities is an attack on several fronts," said Stefan Scheuer, EEB's EU Policy Director. "This would allow companies to move waste for burning much more easily. Central Europe must not become a dustbin for its richer neighbours."
The Commission aims to classify municipal waste incinerators as 'recovery facilities' once they achieve a certain level of energy efficiency , reversing a ruling by the European Court of Justice that they are, in fact, disposal facilities.
The Commission claims its proposal is justified by the need to promote energy efficiency in incinerators. But the Commission really seems to be mainly concerned with promoting incineration to help Member States carry out their obligation to divert biowaste away from landfill sites instead of promoting recycling.
"The Visegrad statement stresses that there are other ways of enforcing the Waste Incineration Directive's existing requirements to achieve energy efficiency than the Commission's recovery dodge," said EEB's Melissa Shinn.
"We want other countries, especially Germany , to recognise the need to take a different approach from that of the Commission. The EU's waste policy should not make it easier for people to burn waste, especially recyclable biowaste. Nor should it go against the 'proximity' principle of keeping waste as close to home as possible, and maintaining political pressure to find better solutions both for the environment and jobs, by preventing, reusing and recycling waste".
The policy encouraging producers to curb waste generation will be undermined by weakening the 'self-sufficiency' and 'proximity' principles. But those are not the only waste management principles that this approach threatens.
Defining municipal incinerators as 'recovery facilities' will not only damage the policy driving waste producers to cut or recycle and compost their waste output it will also 'green' the image of incineration which can be very relevant for distorting the application of EU Structural funds. EU subsidies for incineration result in an un-level playing field for investment in re-use and recycling. Re-use and recycling not only deliver better long-term environmental advantages but also provide far greater job opportunities.
Posted on 18th May 2006
IEMA reacts to IPCC report: AR6 Climate Change 2021
- 9th August 2021
IEMA reacts to CCC Progress report to Parliament
- 24th June 2021
IEMA reacts to Climate Change Committee Report
- 15th June 2021
IEMA Reacts to Queen’s Speech
- 11th May 2021
Enhancing Scotland’s EIA Community - Scotland’s EIA Conference 2021 moves online
- 22nd April 2021
IEMA launches senior management briefing on how organisations can benefit from effective environmental auditing
- 29th March 2021