The Bank of England is the UK’s central bank. Our mission is “to promote the good of the people of the United Kingdom by maintaining monetary and financial stability”. Every team in the Bank has an implicit responsibility to contribute to this mission, even those – like Procurement – who are not directly involved in setting monetary policy or supervising the financial services industry.
It is important to the Procurement team that we have the biggest possible positive impact. We recently set out to strengthen sustainability principles in our procurement. The following ‘4 Cs’ are the steps that we would recommend to any organisation hoping to do the same.
We wanted to redefine what procurement means at the Bank. We came up with an analogy to help our colleagues understand what we do: ‘Procurement is to suppliers what HR is to our staff i.e. recruiting, developing and managing suppliers as a key part of the Bank’s 'talent pool’.
At all stages of this procurement cycle, we aim to embed principles of sustainability. This means that we favour suppliers with a demonstrable commitment to sustainability, and work with our suppliers to continuously improve. We wanted to redefine what ‘value for money’ means to the Bank, with sustainability and shared values contributing to our understanding of quality. We wanted to ensure that our priorities were clear, that sustainability considerations had a real impact on decisions made, and that we could measure our achievements.
The Bank’s own code of conduct, 'Our Code', outlines the standard of conduct expected from individuals working at the Bank. In line with this, we decided to create the Bank's 'Supplier Code of Practice' to highlight the values and principles that we expect our suppliers to embrace and put into practice.
We started by looking at the UN's sustainable development goals, selecting the areas that were most relevant to us and consulting with subject matter experts where appropriate – for example with our inclusion team and our green team. Our supplier code clearly and concisely explains why the principles we have selected are important to us, and sets out at a high level what we expect from the organisations we partner with.
This isn’t something that a Procurement team can do alone; these changes need buy-in from across the organisation and from suppliers. Our supplier code was widely communicated across the Bank and there is an on-going training programme for all internal buyers to ensure that they are aware of their responsibilities. The Supplier Code of Practice is linked to the Bank's standard terms and conditions of contract and all new suppliers receive a copy when they engage in a Bank tender process.
We have developed an online 'triage tool', which gives a personalised recommendation for each procurement. This informs all internal buyers of the relevant policy requirements they need to consider and the internal subject matter experts they need to consult when procuring goods or services. This is how we ensure that key sustainability requirements are baked into specifications from very early in the procurement process, and only the suppliers who can meet these requirements are selected.
Sharing ideas and comparing experiences has been incredibly helpful. The Bank is an active member of Hellios, a community of 30 + financial institutions working together to agree supplier management information and standards. We recently led a working group to refresh the group’s approach to the environmental requirements with a special focus on climate action, which is now implemented. By working together, we can ensure better, further-reaching outcomes, and reduce the work we have to do in ‘re-inventing the wheel’.
We also see collaboration with suppliers as key. We monitor sustainability performance in contracts as part of the contract management process where relevant. This helps us to ensure continuous improvement, for everyone’s benefit.
It’s a cliché, but this really is a journey. We will continue to learn, adapt and improve, and to ask more from our suppliers and from ourselves.
Find out more about all of the IEMA Sustainability Impact Awards winners for 2020 here.
Please note: the views expressed in this blog are those of the individual contributing member, and are not necessarily representative of the views of IEMA or any professional institutions with which IEMA is associated.
Posted on 19th November 2020
Written by Peter Quinn
Climate and Security – Are they related?
- 13th May 2021
Mandating climate-related financial reporting: IEMA's response to Government Consultation
- 12th May 2021
Environmental professionals have a lot on their plate in 2021
- 4th May 2021
Earth Day 2021: Voices for the Future
- 22nd April 2021
IEMA Environmental Impact Assessment Quality Mark – 10 Year Anniversary
- 19th April 2021
Why does 96% of our most valuable resource go unused?
- 15th April 2021