As if Covid-19 isn’t enough, extreme weather events are high on national and international risk registers. Met Office central projections estimate an average 2oC increase in summer temperatures. Sounds nice, but it includes heat waves and these are central projections which assume we reduce our carbon emissions enough and the worst effects of climate change do not materialise.
Extreme heat waves cause immense discomfort and lead to excess summer deaths. So, it’s worth remembering that the Decent Homes standard, which determines the quality of English social homes, requires “thermal comfort”. Although this is widely interpreted in the sector as providing winter warmth, it may not be long before eagle-eyed lawyers raise disrepair claims because homes are too hot.
We have been helping social landlords on environmental reporting and strategy building for over 12 years using our SHIFT scheme. During this time, we have found that there are no adequate tools to help landlords identify which homes are at risk of overheating. We ended up devising a simple tool that landlords can use as part of their SHIFT assessment.
We would, however, like to see a national approach, so that landlords carry out the risk assessment and make relevant intervention. Furthermore, any national approach should incorporate the main risk factors and be cost effective to use.
The overheating risk assessment methodology for building regulations is demonstrably inadequate. It has been in place since 2006 and many homes built since then overheat. The methodology uses historical, cooler, summer temperatures, not projected, hotter ones. Communal heating service pipes are also not taken into account even though they leak heat into homes. Lastly, the methodology is only used for new build homes, not existing homes. These are relatively simple fixes that would help landlords improve their housing stock.
There are a few, very detailed simulation models available, but they tend to be costly and not really suitable for mass assessment of existing homes. They tend to be used mostly in new build care homes where the costs can be absorbed, and vulnerable people will be living.
New tools and technologies are emerging, but as far as we’re aware, there is nothing (apart from ours!) that incorporates all risk factors, future projections and is cost effective for landlords.
Even if a national tool emerged and landlords found out which homes are at risk, what should they do? For new build, the answer is to include passive cooling measures during the design stage and ensure they are implemented. Ensuring adequate ventilation, external shading and green spaces are reasonable interventions at this stage. There is also evidence that some of this will save money. For example, communal heating systems are often oversized (hence more expensive) and as a result have larger service pipes running around the corridors.
For existing homes, the story will be different, and some kind of retrofit solution will be needed. And it may be hard to convince finance directors that money is worth spending on preventing overheating because it is hard to demonstrate the counterfactual. However, we suggest steps that landlords can take that will help.
It may be worth cross checking the list of high-risk homes with homes that have condensation problems. Retrofitting adequate ventilation will help with both issues and save potential disrepair claims where damp and mould exist.
Boosting existing green spaces with more trees will help and is relatively easy to do. Although the summer cooling effect will only be small, natural habitat will be improved and fit into other environmental policies which are creeping up government agenda, such as biodiversity offsetting. Plus, it will be a nicer place for residents to live, help with local air quality and provide extra flood attenuation - addressing another climate change risk.
Landlords may also consider investigating responsive actions. Ideally, fitting external shading for some properties will give maintenance teams experience of doing so, in readiness for heat waves that occur. This saves a huge learning curve during a heat wave. A source of plug-in fans that residents could use would be a second-best option.
Returning to the national approach, here are the things that we believe need doing:
- Upgrade the current building regulation methodology to include the missing risk factors (i.e. projected summer temperatures and pipework from communal heating systems)
- Carry out a short research project to calibrate the current methodology against more detailed dynamic simulation modelling methods and actual overheating homes. The aim will be to predict average internal summer temperatures more accurately. Once this is established for a range of archetypes, incorporate into building regulations
- Ensure that the methodology is incorporated into existing homes EPC calculations
- Require all social landlords to report the number of homes at low risk of overheating as part of an annual environmental performance report.
A fairly straightforward plan which will make our homes and environment much more sustainable.
Please note: the views expressed in this blog are those of the individual contributing member, and are not necessarily representative of the views of IEMA or any professional institutions with which IEMA is associated
Posted on 19th August 2020
Written by Richard Lupo
Lessons from the past on Building Back Better
- 7th October 2020
Willmott Dixon's new sustainability strategy
- 7th October 2020
IEMA Major Accidents and Disasters in EIA Guide
- 23rd September 2020
Is the future of SEA digital?
- 21st September 2020
How can we do things differently and how can we get round what we can no longer do at all?
- 9th September 2020
Starting a new chapter
- 4th September 2020