Updated: Heavy industry to make millions from EU ETS

20th June 2011


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Resource extraction ,
  • Manufacturing ,
  • Carbon Trading ,
  • Construction ,
  • Mitigation

Author

IEMA

Energy-intensive firms petitioning against change to the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS), stand to make millions from huge surpluses in allowances, according to climate change campaigning group Sandbag.

Using publicly available data, Sandberg calculates that at the end of 2010, 10 firms manufacturing steel and cement in Europe held more than 240 million surplus allowances under the ETS, worth approximately £3.6 billion.

An overestimation of the amount of carbon credits needed when the scheme was launched, coupled with the ability to buy offsets cheaply from outside the EU, has enabled the companies to create huge surpluses of allowances without making any efficiency savings claims Sandberg.

However, the steel manufacturers have responded arguing the surpluses have been a direct result of lower outputs due to the global financial crisis and any benefit will be outweighed by costs incurred through the ETS in future.

Metals manufacturer AcrcerlorMittal is named the biggest ‘carbon fat cat’ by Sandbag with an estimated 97 million surplus credits, followed by construction materials firm Lafarge with 29 million credits and Tata Steel with 23 million.

Under the ETS, which is now in its second phase, companies are allocated a number of free allowances and are allowed to carry them over into the next phase, due to start in 2013.

Sandberg’s calculations reveal that by the beginning of phase III the 10 firms it lists will have stored 330 million credits, worth more than £4.9 billion.

The organisations can then use the free credits or sell them on for profit. Sandberg claims that ArcelorMittal and Lafarge have already begun selling credits making £151 million and £264 million respectively.

“More and more businesses see that Europe’s future lies in a highly efficient economy with low pollution, and they are demanding reform of the ETS as essential to help them get there,” said Baroness Worthington, Sandbag’s founding director.

“With millions of spare carbon permits it’s no wonder that the carbon fat cats oppose reform of the ETS, but without action this central tool to direct investment into clean energy will be undermined.”

The steel manufacturers, however, argue that Sandbag has missed the context behind the ETS.

“From 2013 the ETS will start imposing costs that will greatly exceed any benefits thrown up by the unexpected severity and longevity of the recession,” confirmed a spokesman from Tata Steel.

The companies argue that with greater costs, the more energy-efficient steel manufacturers in Europe will not be able to compete with less efficient plants outside the bloc, resulting in an overall increase in global emissions from the sector.

Tata Steel says that energy-intensive industries are not campaigning against the ETS but requesting a level playing field in carbon markets so the costs imposed do not weaken European competitiveness.

“Without that, home grown industries’ ability to provide the materials necessary to build the low-carbon economy will be undermined and carbon emissions will rise because of imports transported from less regulated regions,” said a spokesperson.

ArcelorMittal agree, arguing that: “the best solution would be to have a global agreement with comparable reduction targets in all countries where steel is produced.”

ArcelorMittal’s spokesperson also confirmed the firm was reinvesting the profits from the sale of surplus allowances to improve its energy-efficiency footprint.

Sandbag, however, maintains that the massive surpluses of credits held by companies in the heavy industry sectors, like steel and cement manufacturing, is making the ETS untenable and the group suggests reforms are needed to ensure emissions reductions are made.

Sandbag supports a tougher target of a 30% cut in EU carbon dioxide emissions by 2020, lowering the number of allowances given during the next phase of the scheme and initiating action tacking the use of offsets.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

EU and UK citizens fear net-zero delivery deficit

Support for net zero remains high across the UK and the EU, but the majority of citizens don't believe that major emitters and governments will reach their climate targets in time.

16th May 2024

Read more

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

Taxing the extraction of fossil fuels in the world’s most advanced economies could raise $720bn (£575bn) by 2030 to support vulnerable countries facing climate damages, analysis has found.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close