UK must consider embodied CO2
- Products ,
- Manufacturing ,
- Reporting ,
- Engineering and metals ,
- Life Cycle Analysis
The energy department is risking the UK's climate change ambitions by failing to consider the greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions generated overseas in making imported products and services, according to the energy and climate change committee
In a new report, MPs warn that by not including emissions related to the consumption of goods made outside the UK, DECC is portraying a false account of the country’s impact on GHG production globally, which could result in more emissions being offshored in the future.
DECC’s calculations, which only count GHGs physically created in the UK, estimate that emissions dropped by 19% between 1990 and 2009; however, Defra figures for the same period reveal that consumption-based emissions rose by 20%.
“Successive governments have claimed to be cutting climate-changing emissions, but in fact a lot of pollution has simply been outsourced overseas,” argued Tim Yeo, chair of the committee.
“We get through more consumer goods than ever before in the UK and this is pushing up emissions in manufacturing countries like China.”
The report concludes that emissions savings calculated by DECC have been the result of the move from coal to gas-fired power stations and the relocation of manufacturing facilities outside the UK, rather than from more sustainable production and consumption patterns.
It argues that DECC must consider consumption-based emissions alongside territorial emissions to create a true picture of the UK’s global impacts.
Acknowledging the embodied carbon of imports, it states, could give the government greater power to lever improvements in emissions overseas and help to tackle negative consumer behaviour.
Seven of the UK's 17 key industry sectors are still increasing their emissions year-on-year, and most will miss their 2050 net-zero targets without significant government action, new research suggests.
The UK’s transition to net-zero emissions will only succeed if the government does more to involve the public in designing climate-related policies, the Institute for Government has warned.
In a joint editorial, more than 200 health journals have called on governments to take emergency action to tackle the “catastrophic harm to health” caused by climate change.
COVID-19 recovery packages have largely focused on protecting, rather than transforming, existing industries, and have been a “lost opportunity” for speeding up the global energy transition.