The way of water

1st June 2023


Water feature

Related Topics

Author

Sandra Norval

We need to embrace the spirit of the pioneers of the water sector and planning to enable new models that challenge the status quo, says Sandra Norval

Water is the essence of life. There’s a resounding cry from the public for the water industry to clean up its act. It is a broad topic, with issues ranging from storm overflows, through spills and incidents, to the impact on the development industry of water and nutrient neutrality position statements issued by Natural England. The UK government’s new Environmental Improvement Plan includes goals for clean and plentiful water and Defra’s Plan for Water sets out its commitments and actions to provide an “integrated plan for delivering clean and plentiful water”.

There is a lot to do, but we have a strong band of professionals who are passionate about driving the change that is needed, and the key stakeholders are united in a shared goal of transforming our interactions with water.

I joined the industry in 2021 to work on the growth of sewer and water networks relating to local plans, neighbourhood plans and planning applications. With a mandate to bring my sustainability experience into the role, I set about understanding how water and planning connect in the UK. It has been a fascinating progression, with a history rooted in disease control and a future that will be key to addressing water scarcity as well as the more obvious impacts on the environment.

My focus has been on the role of development, and my work with local planning authorities (LPAs), land promoters and developers has revealed the complexities of addressing water issues within the planning space. The Plan for Water recognises a need to adapt the planning system, but it’s useful to first consider how we got where we are.

Step back in time

In 1854, John Snow identified a connection between water pumps and the cholera outbreaks at the time. A simple fix – removing the handle of the pump – resolved the problem, and led to a long-term relationship between the treatment and delivery of clean, nourishing water to the masses and the design of towns and cities. A few years later, Sir Joseph Bazalgette saw the link between contamination of water from sewage and cholera, and developed London’s first sewer network, which is still in service today. The design, along with release systems to prevent flooding in times of heavy rain, was replicated across the UK, and the Victorians were happy that they had tackled the issues of the day. Cities grew and the networks grew with them, with responsibilities embedded in the Public Health Act 1875 and minimum standards set in the Housing and Town Planning Act 1909.

Public health, planning and the water sector remained intrinsically connected, with the emergence of the first Town and Country Planning Act 1947, which set out the basics of the planning system, part of a suite of social legislation, which included the creation of the National Health Service (NHS). These Acts were designed to ensure that the key systems on which society depended worked together effectively, and they were groundbreaking in their spirit and scale.

A parting of the ways

Then things started to diverge. The Water Resources Act 1963 saw water split from direct public authority control with the establishment of river authorities and water resources boards, although public authorities still held seats on the boards to retain some connection and influence.

The Water Act 1973 established water authorities independent of councils, although the water companies remained key consultees. Planning was evolving, and towns and cities were growing more rapidly, increasing the need to develop the networks for fresh and foul water.

In 1983, the foundations for privatisation were laid, reducing the local authority role further. The water authorities became private companies in 1989, taking them out of the public sector and into a space where new private investment was enabled. The divergence was complete.

As it stands, water companies are a statutory consultee for LPAs when preparing their local plans, but not for planning applications. Some LPAs retain close relationships with water companies, others don’t, and this often means there is a gap in understanding between these key sectors, leading to the public frustrations we see today.

Governance processes for LPAs and water companies have evolved. Key processes such as local plans (for LPAs) and the asset management planning process (for water companies) – which includes management plans for water resources, drainage and wastewater and surface water, along with other supporting plans – were intended to link together, but they don’t always knit closely if the relationships between LPAs and water companies aren’t strong.

The decisions of the land promoters and developers who are shaping the landscapes in which future homes are set have significant consequences for the future of water, yet the water companies often barely connect with the broader plans in their regions.

Looking ahead

In the current planning phase for the water sector, regional water resources planning has enabled a more strategic approach at landscape scale, seeking to identify how water can be transported from areas with sufficient supplies to those where they are scarce – no mean feat. This requires collaborative approaches to infrastructure development and local processes that align development with the resources available. For this to work, we need open and honest dialogue, enabled by realistic proposals and supporting relationships that unlock progress.

The range of emerging themes that the sector is being called on to tackle will need similar thinking. There is a great deal of work to be done.

But with strategic challenges of this nature come the biggest opportunities. We must ensure that we are developing a bank of water professionals with planning skills to develop multi-stakeholder proposals and challenge the status quo. The future will require creative approaches, blending nature-based solutions with grey infrastructure, understanding how we can reconnect the water cycle and adopting methods and thinking that break the boundaries we have set ourselves.

In short, we need to embrace the spirit of the pioneers of the water sector, public health and planning to come up with new models that enable genuine strategic collaboration. The moment for environmental professionals to bridge the gap between planning and water is here.


Timeline of changes to governance of the water system

Sandra Norval, FIEMA, CEnv, is future growth lead, Southern Water. All opinions are the author’s own.

Image credit: Shutterstock

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

A social conscience

With a Taskforce on Inequality and Social-related Financial Disclosures in the pipeline, Beth Knight talks to Chris Seekings about increased recognition of social sustainability

6th June 2024

Read more

Disinformation about the impossibility of averting the climate crisis is part of an alarming turn in denialist tactics, writes David Burrows

6th June 2024

Read more

While biodiversity net gain is now making inroads, marine net gain is still in its infancy. Ed Walker explores the balance between enabling development and safeguarding our marine environment

6th June 2024

Read more

David Symons, FIEMA, director of sustainability at WSP, and IEMA’s Lesley Wilson, tell Chris Seekings why a growing number of organisations are turning to nature-based solutions to meet their climate goals

6th June 2024

Read more

Sarah Spencer on the clear case for stronger partnerships between farmers and renewable energy developers

6th June 2024

Read more

Groundbreaking legislation on air and noise pollution and measures to tackle growing concerns over disposable vapes provide the focus for Neil Howe’s environmental legislation update

6th June 2024

Read more

A system-level review is needed to deliver a large-scale programme of retrofit for existing buildings. Failure to do so will risk missing net-zero targets, argues Amanda Williams

31st May 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close