The assessment of peat resources

24th April 2013

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Renewable ,
  • Natural resources ,
  • Ecosystems ,
  • Consultancy



Julia Tindale, from RPS, discusses the increasingly important issue of how peat is examined as a resource in environmental impact assessments (EIAs)

There is no fixed methodology for the assessment of peat as a resource through the EIA process. However, over the last five years there has been increasing concern expressed about the potential effects of development on peat resources, in particular wind farm development.

In 2011, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (which includes Scottish Natural Heritage, Natural England, the Northern Ireland Environment Agency and the then Countryside Commission for Wales (CCW)) produced a report entitled Towards an assessment of the state of the UK peatlands, which provided an overview of the extent and nature of the peat resource across the UK.

In addition, CCW produced guidance for assessing the impact of wind farm development on peatlands in 2010, and the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency and Scottish Renewables published guidance on the assessment of peat volumes for developments during 2012.

The requirements of statutory bodies with regard to peat assessment have, therefore, evolved in tandem with their emerging guidance. This has created challenges for developers on sites where the guidance has been introduced during the application process, when the environmental assessment is largely complete.

In some cases developers have had to play catch up, carrying out retrospective peat survey work and then adjusting elements of the development to try to minimise impacts on peat resources.

However, for newly emerging sites there are a number of common threads that run through the guidance that has been produced and that should be taken into account in EIA.

The first consideration is that the location and nature of peat resources should be taken into account early on in the design process wherever possible. The key premise should be to avoid peat resources if at all possible. If avoidance is not possible, then the effects should be reduced wherever feasible and opportunities to mitigate any effects should be considered.

Guidance recommends that a typical soil resource assessment methodology should be adopted for this work. This includes a desktop study of all relevant data, including soils and geological mapping, together with aerial photography of the site.

On many sites, this combination of information can help to identify areas likely to comprise deep peat resources (more than 1m deep) where impacts could be significant, and this may help to inform the design process.

In some cases, more site-specific survey work may be available. For example, where wind farms are proposed in forested areas, Forestry Commission soils maps may have been produced prior to planting which can provide the most recent and spatially detailed soils data.

If the desktop study indicates that soil types likely to comprise peaty horizons are present onsite, this should be followed by a site reconnaissance survey.

Reconnaissance surveys include a limited site soil survey targeted in the areas indicated by the results of the desktop study. Such surveys can use photographic recordings of soil observations, including soil pits, and can be used together with information from other specialists, including ecologists and hydrologists, to provide additional information to refine the design of the proposal and its potential effects on peatland.

Detailed site assessment work is carried out once the design for the project is fully developed and the potential effect on peat resources has been limited as far as possible. The survey should comprise peat probing or auger borings to provide soil data at regular intervals. This will identify the depth and nature of peat materials that may be directly affected by the project.

It is advisable to consult the appropriate statutory body at this stage, providing a summary of the findings of the desktop study and initial site survey, and to agree a methodology for the detailed survey work that is proposed. If concerns are raised about the density and location of sampling proposed, or the information to be recorded, this is best discussed and resolved before visiting the site.

If the detailed site assessment identifies volumes of peat that will be affected by the project, and there is no scope for final scheme adjustments to avoid or reduce the effects on these resources, appropriate mitigation measures should be designed. These measures are likely to include appropriate soil-handling techniques for moving the peat and the consideration of appropriate storage and restoration locations. If possible, there should be further consultation with the statutory authority to discuss the most appropriate soil-handling methodology for the site.

In summary, consideration of peat resources should, if possible, be integrated into development design as an early a stage as possible. Although it is possible to introduce mitigation measures at a later stage, recent experience on wind farm sites indicates that statutory authorities may require additional peat assessment work to be undertaken where they do not consider sufficient effort has been made to avoid or reduce the effects on those resources.

This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Julia Tindale is a technical director at RPS Oxford


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close