Sustainability: it's in the balance

29th July 2011


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Local government ,
  • Construction ,
  • Natural resources ,
  • Management ,
  • Mitigation

Author

IEMA

The publication this week of the government's proposed new approach to planning (NPPF) has thrown into sharp relief the many different interpretations of what it means to be sustainable

Governments, businesses, charitable organisations and environmentalists each differ in their view of the correctly weighted balance of the triple bottom line – people, planet and profit – depending on their circumstances.

It came as little surprise then, that the UK government interprets a positive attitude towards economic growth as central to a planned “presumption for sustainable development”, while charities, such as the National Trust, argue that the planning system’s primary concern should be in protecting the natural environment.

Without economic growth society cannot endure, argues government, but without protecting natural resources we cannot sustain our economy, says the charity, in a well-established debate that is played out in many organisations across the private, public and third sectors.

For those working in the environment profession this can feel like walking a tightrope. The drive to do as much as possible to tackle an organisation’s environmental impacts must be tempered by the realities of available resources.

And surely, rather than focusing on whether money, people or the natural environment is more important, the real key to sustainability is a holistic approach to managing resources.

Bjorn Lomborg, for example, famously argues that rather than spending billions annually trying to cut carbon emissions in line with Kyoto, more good could be done for society and the planet by diverting those resources to other philanthropic causes and the development of new technologies.

This week, Professor Gough, of the London School of Economics, published a paper arguing that fuel poverty would be better tackled by spending less on poorly targeted winter fuel payments and more on programmes to improve insulation.

Similarly, the government’s recent waste review was criticised for not putting in place standards that would convert waste into a commodity providing energy, recyclate and fertiliser.

What is needed, says Gough, is a better integration of environmental and economic policy.

For all its pledges for “sustainable” development, there remain serious questions as to whether the government has achieved that integration with the NPPF.

A “presumption for sustainable development”, does not a sustainable development make.

Do you agree? Why not start a discussion in the IEMA LinkedIn Group and have your say?

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

EU and UK citizens fear net-zero delivery deficit

Support for net zero remains high across the UK and the EU, but the majority of citizens don't believe that major emitters and governments will reach their climate targets in time.

16th May 2024

Read more

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

Taxing the extraction of fossil fuels in the world’s most advanced economies could raise $720bn (£575bn) by 2030 to support vulnerable countries facing climate damages, analysis has found.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close