Speak up or shut up?

2nd February 2023


Chris Seekings investigates the rise of corporate ‘greenhushing’ as companies look to downplay their sustainability credentials

With consumers, governments and investors increasingly wary of companies publicising their sustainability credentials amid accusations of greenwashing, a new trend is emerging. A recent poll by consultancy firm South Pole found that one in four large companies with science-based net-zero targets have decided not to publicise them, and separate research has uncovered similar findings.

As a result, more sustainability professionals are now discussing ‘greenhushing’ – the practice of downplaying climate and environmental policies out of fear that they will be perceived as insincere, or as deliberately deceiving the public in pursuit of higher market share and profit.

Although the term was first coined as far back as 2008, it is likely that we will see more firms staying silent on their sustainability credentials this year. “I’ve seen a really big shift from 2018, when we had the big boom in everyone saying ‘Let’s sign up to this new alliance and let’s commit to this ridiculous proposition’,” a contact who advises large companies on sustainability and governance tells me. “CEOs were thinking, I’m not going to be here in 2050, so all these promises will be someone else’s problem. The risk of making a false promise is so much higher now.”

Eco scrutiny

A huge driver of this trend has been the impact of new regulation and government scrutiny. The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority last year opened an investigation into how products and services claiming to be ‘eco-friendly’ are being marketed, and whether consumers could be being misled. Meanwhile, new EU legislation could soon prohibit companies from making generic or vague claims about environmental performance that cannot be backed up.

There is also additional pressure from investors, who want to be sure they are not funnelling money into companies that could be accused of greenwashing. “The impact of regulations, and of their own investors, is growing quite significantly,” my contact tells me. “They might be mid-sized companies, but they’re looking at European regulations, the impact of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, and being asked questions about their sustainability claims by large investors like BlackRock.”

The public backlash

Caution when publicising sustainability credentials shows that many companies are starting to take the issue seriously, rather than simply trying to entice new customers. Public pressure has also driven greenhushing. A survey by consultancy firm Sensu Insight found that just 23% of the UK public take environmental, social and corporate governance claims at face value, while 14% typically disbelieve them.

However, these people may well be among the first to voice their anger if businesses are seen to be doing nothing on the climate and environment, leaving sustainability professionals caught between a rock and a hard place. “The impact of consumer mindset changes in the past three years is massive, and companies are reluctant to make promises they can’t keep,” my contact says. It is also the responsibility of companies leading on the climate and environment to inspire others to follow in their footsteps, and greenhushing could be seen as a failure of leadership.

Total transparency

As well as failing to inspire others, companies that practise greenhushing may themselves be accused of adopting a more sophisticated form of greenwashing if they are perceived as being deceptive and avoiding scrutiny. This idea was explored in a January report by the think tank Planet Tracker (see bit.ly/3XfntOZ).

The solution is transparency – backed by evidence – so the public, governments and investors can see all the outcomes of a business’s operations, whether it be turnover, profits, carbon footprint, biodiversity impact or effect on society, and make decisions objectively. Although greenhushing may have unintended consequences, it could be a sign that the era of misleading corporate jargon is dead, and that honesty is starting to prevail as businesses get serious about their impact. They have no choice.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Facing the climate emergency challenge in local government

It’s well recognised that the public sector has the opportunity to work towards a national net-zero landscape that goes well beyond improving on its own performance; it can also influence through procurement and can direct through policy.

19th March 2024

Read more

Dr Julie Riggs issues a call to arms to tackle a modern-day human tragedy

15th March 2024

Read more

Disgraced environmental consultant Peter Lovebrother is another month nearer retirement…

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

Multinational corporations are undermining their net-zero commitments with excessive air travel and no plans to reduce ‘the low hanging fruit’ of carbon footprints, a study by Transport & Environment has found.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s climate adaptation plans are ‘inadequate’ and falling ‘far short’ of what is required, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) has warned today.

13th March 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close