Solar geoengineering could cause widespread crop failure

9th August 2018


Web solar istock 510853284

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Agriculture ,
  • Solar

Author

David S Burt

Plans to cool the planet by reflecting sunlight back into space would be just as damaging to crop production as extreme heat caused by climate change, the University of California, Berkley, has found.

The research shows that, while helping crops to grow, any improvements in yield caused by cooler temperatures would be cancelled out by lower productivity due to reduced sunlight.

This has important implications for understanding the effects of solar geoengineering, a method proposed to help humanity manage the impacts of global warming.

“It’s a bit like performing an experimental surgery – the side-effects of treatment appear to be as bad as the illness,” study lead author, Jonathan Proctor, said.

“For agriculture, the unintended impacts of solar geoengineering are equal in magnitude to the benefits.”

It has been argued that purposely injecting sulfate aerosols into the upper atmosphere could reflect sunlight and artificially cool the earth, replicating a phenomenon observed when volcanoes erupt.

A study in the Philippines back in 1991 successfully reduced the average global temperature by around half a degree using this method.

However, after monitoring crop production over 30 years, and observing aerosols in the atmosphere using satellite images, the latest study concluded that the loss of sunlight would cancel out the benefits of reduced heat.

Despite the results, Proctor said: “I don’t think we should necessarily write off solar geoengineering. For agriculture, it might not work that well, but there are other sectors of the economy that could potentially benefit substantially.”

Proctor emphasised the need for more research into the human and ecological consequences of deliberately manipulating the Earth’s climate system, both good and bad.

The latest study did not address other types of geoengineering like carbon capture and storage, or the impact on the protective ozone layer, and who decides how temperatures should be.

“Society needs to be objective about geoengineering technologies and develop a clear understanding of the potential benefits, costs and risks,” Proctor continued.

“At present, uncertainty about these factors dwarfs what we understand.”

Image credit: iStock

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

IEMA reviews political party manifestos

Ahead of the UK general election next month, IEMA has analysed the Labour, Conservative, Liberal Democrat, and Green Party manifestos in relation to the sustainability agenda.

19th June 2024

Read more

Sarah Spencer on the clear case for stronger partnerships between farmers and renewable energy developers

6th June 2024

Read more

A system-level review is needed to deliver a large-scale programme of retrofit for existing buildings. Failure to do so will risk missing net-zero targets, argues Amanda Williams

31st May 2024

Read more

Chris Seekings reports from a webinar helping sustainability professionals to use standards effectively

31st May 2024

Read more

Although many organisations focus on scope 1 and 2 emissions, it is vital to factor in scope 3 emissions and use their footprint to drive business change

31st May 2024

Read more

Joe Nisbet explores the challenges and opportunities of delivering marine net gain through offshore renewables

31st May 2024

Read more

IEMA submits response to the Future Homes Standard consultation

31st May 2024

Read more

Hello and welcome to the June/July of Transform.

31st May 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close