Silt costs three construction firms

5th July 2013


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Pollution & Waste Management ,
  • Water ,
  • Prosecution ,
  • Corporate fine ,
  • Construction

Author

IEMA

Failing to prevent silt entering a watercourse during construction work has cost three companies a total of £18,000 in fines and £8,229 in costs

Redditch magistrates’ court was told that a large quantity of silt had entered Battlefield Brook, Bromsgrove, in January 2012, polluting the watercourse for at least a mile, with levels of solid matter suspended in the water more than 250 times higher than normal.

Environment Agency officers traced the source to a nearby building site, where earthmoving equipment had been tracking through the brook and bulldozing the banks.

Investigations found that three companies – Cala Homes (Midlands) and RM Contractors and Complete Tree Services – had failed to take simple measures to prevent silt entering the brook during the clearance works.

Poor judgment, failure to assess the risk and inadequate monitoring of the work were highlighted as contributing factors to the pollution.

Cala Homes and R M Contractors were each fined £8,000, while Matthew Lea (trading as Complete Tree Services) was fined £2,000.

All three firms were also ordered to each pay £2,743.72 in costs.


Transform articles

Regulator publishes new code to tackle 'greenwashing'

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.

22nd September 2021

Read more

The UK government must develop regulation to stop the financial sector from providing billions of pounds to companies that threaten rainforests worldwide, WWF has said.

10th September 2021

Read more

Over two million hectares of Brazilian rainforest could be legally converted to supply the UK with soy under a new anti-deforestation law proposed by the government, the WWF has found.

26th August 2021

Read more

The Better Business Act would put responsibility to society and the environment on the same footing as responsibility to shareholders, explains Chris Turner

30th July 2021

Read more

In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).

30th July 2021

Read more

Thames Water has been fined £4m after untreated sewage escaped from sewers below London into a park and a river.

30th July 2021

Read more

In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.

28th May 2021

Read more

Are voluntary commitments enough to make the private sector act on waste? David Burrows explores the issues

28th May 2021

Read more

Government announcements on infrastructure reveal a direction of travel but key details are still unknown, says Huw Morris

29th January 2021

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert