SBTi clarifies that ‘no change has been made’ to its stance on offsetting

16th April 2024

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

Last week, the SBTi – which verifies corporate climate targets – announced that it would be relaxing rules on how companies can use environmental attribute certificates (EACs), including carbon credits, to reduce the emissions they report in their value chains.

This would be subject to basic “rules, thresholds, and guardrails", with companies still required to respect the principles of the mitigation hierarchy.

However, many staff reacted angrily to the announcement, and reportedly wrote a letter to the SBTi Board of Trustees insisting that they were “neither informed nor consulted” on the decision, which had “caused concern, confusion, and damaged the trust of critical stakeholders”.

The SBTi has since published a clarifying statement insisting that “no change has been made to SBTi current standards”, and that “any use of EACs for scope 3 will be informed by evidence.”

“In July, a discussion paper with a draft proposal from SBTi about potential changes to scope 3 will be published which will feed into the standard draft (drafting phase),” the statement adds.

The SBTi has been consulting with stakeholders on new guidance for tackling scope 3 emissions over the last six months, which will form part of its revised Corporate Net-Zero Standard.

In its initial announcement last week, the UN-backed initiative recognised that there is “an ongoing healthy debate” on the subject, but said that “the use of EACs for abatement purposes on scope 3 emissions could function as an additional tool to tackle climate change”.

It also said that it would not validate the quality of carbon credits, insisting that “other entities are better positioned to deal with this activity”.

Yesterday, WWF, which is one of the founders of SBTi, issued its own statement acknowledging the challenges scope 3 emissions present in tackling climate change.

However, it added: “Offsets cannot be a substitute for reducing emissions from company operations, products, and value chains.

“Carbon offsetting needs to be limited in its application to address a small percentage of residual emissions, be bolstered by increased accountability, and pursued as part of a holistic and scientifically defined reduction pathway.”

Image credit: Shutterstock

Further Reading: IEMA - Pathways to Net Zero: Using the IEMA GHG Management Hierarchy - November 2020


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

EU and UK citizens fear net-zero delivery deficit

Support for net zero remains high across the UK and the EU, but the majority of citizens don't believe that major emitters and governments will reach their climate targets in time.

16th May 2024

Read more

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

Taxing the extraction of fossil fuels in the world’s most advanced economies could raise $720bn (£575bn) by 2030 to support vulnerable countries facing climate damages, analysis has found.

2nd May 2024

Read more

The largest-ever research initiative of its kind has been launched this week to establish a benchmark for the private sector’s contribution to the UK’s 2050 net-zero target.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close