Safapac penalties total £92,000
- Chemicals ,
- Manufacturing ,
- Corporate fine ,
Chemical and packaging company Safapac has been ordered to pay more than £90,000 in penalties after sentencing was passed to the Crown Court.
Safapac pleaded guilty at a magistrates’ court in February to polluting the River Nene in June 2012, but magistrates sent the case to the crown court because they felt that their sentencing powers, which are limited to fines of £20,000 per offence, were insufficient.
The firm has now been fined £50,000 and ordered to pay costs of £42,000 by Peterborough Crown Court.
Thousands of fish died when 5,000 litres of agricultural chemicals, including an insecticide and a fungicide, leaked into the river from the firm’s site in Orton Southgate.
Drainage plans held by Safapac for the site and initially shown to officers from the Environment Agency were wrong, as they showed a drain leading to a foul sewer when, in fact, it was a surface water drain that discharged into the river.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a new 'Green Claims Code' to ensure businesses are not misleading consumers about their environmental credentials.
Over two million hectares of Brazilian rainforest could be legally converted to supply the UK with soy under a new anti-deforestation law proposed by the government, the WWF has found.
In Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the claimant applied for judicial review of the legality of the defendants’ joint decision to create the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) as a substitute for UK participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).
In R. (on the application of Hudson) v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC, the appellant appealed against a decision to uphold the local authority’s grant of planning permission for the construction of a holiday village at the Legoland Windsor Resort.