Raising the standard: sustainable investment

2nd November 2020

Rick Gould speaks to John Shideler and Hayden Morgan about why we need ISO's new sustainable investment standards, and what they will deliver

Sustainable investing meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. And according to the World Economic Forum, we need a lot of it – it has determined that from this year we should be investing about US$5.7trn annually in green infrastructure. When it comes to energy, the International Energy Agency estimates that we must invest at least US$53trn during the next 15 years to stop irreversible climate change. Other organisations have calculated that even larger numbers are needed to avert major environmental, social and economic risks.

Where do international standards fit into this? “To avoid greenwashing,“ says Hayden Morgan, convenor of the working group developing ISO 32210 Framework for sustainable finance: Principles and guidance. “Harmonisation, trust, transparency and credibility,“ says John Shideler, who leads the ISO working group developing the ISO 14030 series of standards for green bonds and loans. In other words, they are the tools that enable investors to make sound, sustainable investments.

There are other important related standards in development, too (see Table 1), such as those for disclosing the climate change risks of investments, and the environmental credentials of projects and programmes seeking finance – but ISO 32210 and the ISO 14030 series will play the central role. What are they, and what benefits will they bring?

ISO 32210 – the framework and guidance ISO 32210 will be the leading standard from ISO/TC 322 , ISO's new sustainable finance Technical Committee.

Morgan, associate director at the Green Investment Group (GIG), is an IEMA Fellow with more than two decades of experience in this field, including several years with the GIG's predecessor, the UK's Green Investment Bank.

The standard will serve as the hub and guidance for sustainable finance. “ISO 32210 has a wider scope than just environmental management – it covers all aspects of sustainability,“ he describes. Crucially, ISO 32210 is a framework standard. “It is aimed at supporting organisations across the globe to integrate sustainability principles into their activities.“

“The ISO 14030 series will provide the clarity to determine both the eligibility and credibility of green bonds and loans“

Rules and codes-of-practice in their various forms are hardly new to the financial sector. However, the situation has become confusing when it comes to sustainability. “There is a proliferation of principles, guides, protocols, pledges and regulations, causing opaque and different market definitions for sustainable finance and thus leading to variable and inconsistent market practice,“ explains Morgan. “This also creates confusion among stakeholders and shareholders, as well as a potential lack of trust in a nascent but fast-growing market.“ In other words, a hesitance to invest.

ISO/TC 322 is distilling the best of the rules and guidance in order to bring harmonisation. “ISO 32210 will build on existing practice, standards, initiatives and knowledge, and aims to bring clarity and consistency for market participants,“ says Morgan.

ISO 32210 will also complement existing initiatives, providing market continuity and confidence. And confidence among investors is crucial. “It increases additional capital to finance the transition and mitigate risk,“ says Morgan, while the standard itself will provide the essential element of credibility. “ISO 32210 will also deter inadvertent greenwashing and a misrepresentation of sustainability credentials. It increases coherence, consolidates, harmonises, extends reach and applies global best practice.“

The types of factors which led to the development of ISO 32210 are also the motivation for creating standards for green bonds and debts. How did these particular standards develop?

Green bonds and loans

In 2007, the European Investment Bank launched the first environmentally targeted bond, aimed at investments combating climate change; the World Bank has labelled such investments 'green bonds'. Since then, green bonds have boomed shown enormous potential. Last year, according to the Climate Bonds Initiative, issues of green bonds reached US$257bn, up 51% from 2018, and the growth continues unabated.

Such growth is always accompanied by risks – particularly greenwashing in this case. At the same time, an assortment of proprietary standards, rules and guidance has emerged to support green bonds, including the Climate Bonds Standard, the Green Bond Principles, guidelines of the People's Bank of China and the Green Loan Principles. All were intended to boost the growth of green bonds and loans by providing structure. However, the numerous definitions for green bonds and loans, coupled with the absence of unifying standard rules and criteria, have hindered investment. This is why ISO aims to provide harmonisation, structure, transparency and credibility through the ISO 14030 series.

“The ISO 14030 series will provide the clarity to determine both the eligibility and credibility of green bonds and loans, as well as a robust reporting mechanism for investors,“ explains Shideler, who has worked in standardisation for climate-related fields for several decades and is president of change management organisation Futurepast. The ISO working group convened by Shideler – which includes another IEMA Fellow and colleague of Morgan, the GIG's Adrian Barnes – has been developing the series since 2017, and its work in nearing completion. How has it evolved?

“We initially started by developing one standard,“ says Shideler. “Then we realised we needed complementary standards for a taxonomy of eligible green-debt instruments, and another for verification. Part 1 of ISO 14030 initially covered both types of green-debt instruments, but we decided to split this into two to provide flexibility for the separate requirements of bonds and loans.“ Additionally, because ISO 14030 is a certification standard, Part 4 for verification is needed.

What has the response been from the financial sector? “All of the major players are involved, such as the International Capital Market Association, the Loan Market Association and the Climate Bonds Initiative,“ says Shideler. “We have been extremely fortunate to have good participation from the financial sector, including major banks, environmental NGOs such as the World Wildlife Fund and the European Environmental Citizens' Organisation for Standardisation, and trade associations. This participation has been critical for Part 1 of ISO 14030 especially, and their participation has helped to produce standards that are consistent with the existing standards and principles.“

Rick Gould, MIEMA CEnv, is a technical advisor at the Environment Agency. He is writing in a personal capacity.

Picture credit: IKON


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

SBTi clarifies that ‘no change has been made’ to its stance on offsetting

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

Senior consultant, EcoAct

3rd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close