Paint company fined £650,000 after banned toxin causes water pollution

30th March 2023


International Paint Ltd, whose parent company is AkzoNobel, has been found guilty of causing pollution to the Yealm estuary with hazardous substances, including tributyltin (TBT), copper, mercury and arsenic, leading to a £650,000 fine.

Since 1928, International Paint Ltd has specialised in manufacturing maritime paints, including anti-fouling paints for ships, and had run a testing facility on the River Yealm at Newton Creek. The company also used paints containing TBT as a coating to prevent the build-up of animals, such as barnacles, on the ships’ hulls. That substance was banned for use on small vessels in the 1980s due to the extreme toxicity to the wider marine environment, with a complete ban on the use of this substance coming into force worldwide in the 2000s.

A lengthy investigation by the Environment Agency found that between 2 September 2015 and 27 October 2016, International Paints Ltd caused an unauthorised discharge of chemicals into the waterways causing water pollution, which the company denied.

After ceasing the operations in 2013, the company tried to sell the premises in 2015. The Environment Agency then launched an investigation to determine the source of pollution. The investigation found TBT was present in the sediment of a tank on the site and evidence that some of the sediment had escaped into the estuary. A laboratory review of the sample analysis found nine out of 11 samples collected exceeded safe levels of TBT, and those from closest to the site had 80,000 times the safe level. It was concluded the TBT levels in the estuary were sufficient to have the potential for a major toxic effect on marine life.

Sentencing the company at Plymouth Crown Court, the judge said: “Though I don’t believe anybody directed the TBT should be washed out of the tanks, it is suspicious that the TBT was only discharged when a potential purchaser for whom the presence of TBT in the tanks was a serious problem came along.

“I am quite satisfied that the defendant, having closed its eyes for years to the problem, operated a reckless system in which it utterly failed to control the management of TBT and other chemicals. I’m satisfied that [a caretaker] emptied the TBT into the estuary and that is something that should never have been allowed to happen.”

The company was fined £650,000 and ordered to pay costs of £144,992 under the Environmental Protection Act 1990. They agreed to pay to clear up the pollution, which is likely to cost at least £500,000.


Transform articles

Interview: VIN + OMI provide the shock factor

Trailblazing eco-designers and ‘ideologists’ VIN + OMI speak to Adam Batchelor and Chris Seekings about their work promoting sustainability across the fashion industry and beyond

1st June 2023

Read more

Improvements in satellite monitoring are changing how we measure air quality, widening its potential to include regulation. Rick Gould investigates

1st June 2023

Read more

The global clothing industry is not only unfair but increasingly unsustainable. Huw Morris reports

1st June 2023

Read more

The Circularity Gap Report 2023 for the UK shows that from all the materials that flow through the UK’s economy, just 7.5% are used again, leaving a circularity gap of 92.5%.

31st May 2023

Read more

Plastic pollution can be slashed by 80% globally by 2040 if countries and companies make deep policy and market shifts using existing technologies, according to a report by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP).

31st May 2023

Read more

Water companies could be hit with “unlimited fines” for polluting the environment under a new plan unveiled by the UK government today.

4th April 2023

Read more

As PFAS seep into the public consciousness (and bloodstream), Chris Seekings reports on what’s being done to regulate them

30th March 2023

Read more

Alison Margaret Brown reports on the benefits and risks of using biochar from waste

30th March 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert