Overhauling WEEE rules could save £64m a year

13th June 2013


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Pollution & Waste Management

Author

IEMA

Simplifying the producer responsibility regime for electronic waste could save local authorities and businesses up to £64 million each year, according to computer giant Hewlett Packard (HP)

As a part of the government’s pledge to cut “red tape”, the business department (BIS) is currently consulting on how the rules governing the collection and treatment of waste electronic and electrical equipment (WEEE) could be less burdensome.

According to a report commissioned by HP, creating a system that didn’t impose annual collection targets for producers, but instead linked WEEE collectors – such as local authorities – to producer compliance schemes (PCSs) would simplify the process and save the UK economy annually between £35 million and £64 million.

“A ‘matching process’ provides local authorities with greater flexibility and choice than the current system and will support efforts to increase collection,” explained HP’s Dr Kirstie McIntyre. “It provides collectors of WEEE with the flexibility to choose by waste stream, between a producer collection scheme or managing WEEE collection independently and retaining the value of this WEEE.”

The report claims that WEEE could provide local authorities with an additional income of £20 million a year if the ‘matching process’ proposal was implemented, whereas keeping the existing producer responsibility scheme would cost producers of electrical and electronic equioment an extra £60 million annually.

The report also concludes that another option outlined by BIS, which would impose annual WEEE collection targets on PCSs and charge compliance fees if those targets are not met, would only generate savings of around £11– £26 million each year.

“Within this option it is possible for costs to continue both through the auctioning of collection sites to producer compliance schemes, and through the effective trading of evidence. Without effective control, these would both cause a proportion of the excessive costs and red tape to remain,” warned the report’s author, Phil Conran from consultancy 360 Environmental.

Conran’s analysis of the potential benefits of the ‘matching process’ option is more positive than BIS’s impact analysis, which concluded it was likely to generate a net benefit of £135 million over 10 years.

BIS’s consultation on its plans to amend the WEEE Regulations 2006 and ensure compliance with the recast WEEE Directive 2012/19/EU ends on 21 June.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

UK government accused of attempting to relax sewage rules ‘through the backdoor’

Campaign group Wild Justice has accused the UK government of trying to relax pollution rules for housebuilders “through the backdoor”.

14th February 2024

Read more

Stella Consonni reports on the existing legal framework and the main challenges

15th January 2024

Read more

David Burrows on the stolen concept of a circular economy, and how reduction must be at the heart of product design

30th November 2023

Read more

Zero Waste Scotland is focused on closing the energy sector’s circularity gap. Kenny Taylor reports on progress so far

28th November 2023

Read more

The IEMA Circular Economy Network Steering Group has published a guide on how to integrate circular strategies into your business model.

24th November 2023

Read more

Environmental crimes could result in prison sentences of up to 10 years and company fines of 5% of turnover under a proposed EU law agreed by the European parliament and council.

21st November 2023

Read more

Ellen Williams on the ecosystem approach to sustainably managing economies

14th November 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close