Out of fashion: how the global clothing industry is unfair and unsustainable

1st June 2023

The global clothing industry is not only unfair but increasingly unsustainable. Huw Morris reports

Kaya Dorey sums up how the fashion industry comes with an escalating price tag. “No-one thinks about their $5 T-shirt and how that became $5. People are getting paid lower than liveable wages and working in terrible conditions,” says the founder of Novel Supply Co, a Vancouver fashion company.

“We have this fast-fashion problem. It’s made people think they’re going out of style every week, so they need something new. We’re making products from synthetics derived from petroleum and when we’re fed up, we throw it in the garbage, and it never biodegrades.

“Synthetics and micro-plastics are polluting our waters and now getting into our food. We need to think about what’s going into the product.”

Dorey’s fashion label produces garments free from toxic dyes and synthetics. Instead, it uses hemp and organic cotton and environmentally friendly inks. Her company employs a “closed-loop” philosophy of production, taking back the garments it creates when they are worn out. Novel Supply Co has an automated manufacturing hub to make its products locally. Those products are also biodegradable. “We’re making more products, pay people more, it’s more ethical, more just and more efficient.”

Dorey, who was named a Young Champion of the Earth by the United Nations (UN) in 2017, is in a minority. The fast-fashion business model is responsible for numerous damaging environmental, social, and economic consequences. These are found all along the supply chain, from overproduction to harmful manufacturing processes through to problems with waste disposal, says Willis Towers Watson director David Bennett.

“It’s arguably economically impossible to manufacture, ship and retail a $5 T-shirt or £12 dress in a way that does no harm to the environment, the workers who make it, or the countries left to process the waste.”

Stark figures

Water is one example. Around 7,500 litres is needed to make a single pair of jeans, equivalent to the amount the average person drinks in seven years. According to the UN Conference on Trade and Development, around 93 billion cubic metres of water, enough to serve five million people, is gulped down by the fashion industry annually.

But starker consequences loom. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation predicts that without urgent action the whole industry is on track to chew up a quarter of the global carbon budget by 2050.

Estimates of the global emissions from fashion vary, with reliable data, industry transparency and peer-reviewed scientific research all lacking. McKinsey & Company and Global Fashion Agenda (GFA) put the figure at 4.8%, the UN says it is at least 8% and the World Bank 10%.

Elisa Tonda, head of the UN Environment Programme’s consumption and production unit, says with global clothing and footwear manufacturing concentrated in Asia, the industry relies on hard coal and natural gas to generate electricity and heat. “If we continue with a business-as-usual approach, the greenhouse gas emissions from the industry are expected to rise by almost 50% by 2030.”

That means the global fashion industry will be emitting the same amount as released by India in 2021, a nation of around 1.4 billion people and the third largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China and the US.

"Around 93 billion cubic metres of water, enough to serve five million people, is gulped down by the fashion industry annually"

Fashion consumption is highly unequal between G20 countries, according to research by the Hot or Cool Institute, published jointly with the Rapid Transition Alliance. Australia has the highest footprint, heading for 503kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) per year by 2030, resulting from average per capita consumption of around 2kg of new clothing per year and clothing discards of around 23kg. India, at the other end of the scale among G20 countries, has the lowest per capita fashion consumption footprint at 22kg of CO₂e per year, despite rapidly rising consumption levels and an expanding middle class. That is less than 5% of Australia’s footprint.

Even working to a very conservative estimate that fashion contributes 4% to global emissions, the industry would have to slash its emissions to 1.1 billion tonnes of CO₂e to be on the 1.5°C pathway under the Paris Agreement by 2030, according to the research.

The study also reveals the per capita footprint target for 2030 is exceeded in 14 of the 19 G20 countries – the EU is not included – indicating that rapid and radical reductions in fashion consumption are needed. Estimates of current average per capita footprints by country were calculated as of 2020 and projected to 2030 by considering expected changes in population and gross domestic product (see overleaf).

Indeed, without decarbonising its operations, the fashion sector will be belching out an estimated 2.7 billion tonnes of CO₂e in 2030, say McKinsey and GFA. They estimate that around 70% of fashion’s annual emissions occur in the production and processing stages, 10% in transport and retail, whereas 20% are generated in the use phase.

Other commentators say figures for the use phase can vary, depending on the type of fibre. The highest emissions from cotton clothing, for example, occur during washing and drying.

The cost of haute couture

Yet cheaper clothing is only a part of the problem. The Hot or Cool Institute research found that carbon emissions from fashion consumption by the richest citizens across G20 nations are 10 times higher than those from the bottom income groups in the same countries.

Such findings counter the dominant narrative that it is poorer citizens, buying cheap clothes, who make the fashion industry unsustainable. In fact, it is the scale of purchasing by the richest citizens in countries such as the UK, US, Japan and Germany that is responsible for much of fashion’s climate impact, says the study. The cost of haute couture and designer outfits is borne by more than the credit cards of the wealthiest.

The carbon footprint of fashion consumption among wealthy G20 nations – such as the UK, US, Germany, Japan, and Saudi Arabia – must fall by 60% on average by 2030, the study says. For upper-middle-income nations, like Brazil and South Africa, it needs to fall by 40%. In nations like India and Indonesia, the average carbon footprint of fashion consumption is below the 1.5°C limit.

To bring fashion in line with the global climate commitment of 1.5°C, the richest 20% in the UK, with an average disposable income of £69,126, must cut their consumption footprint by 83%, while the richest 20% in Germany and Italy must cut theirs by 75%. In France, that target should be 50%.

Buying fewer new clothes is four times more effective at cutting emissions than increasing how long they last, the next best solution. To keep the 1.5°C target alive, the study says per capita fashion consumption needs to return to 2010 levels in most high-income countries, alongside reformed business models and slashed emissions in the production, retail and disposal of garments.

In short, system and behaviour change, “especially by wealthy consumers with bulging wardrobes, need to come together so that people dress themselves within planetary and climate boundaries”, says Rapid Transition Alliance coordinator Andrew Simms. “The fashion industry needs to change its ways as quickly as a catwalk model changes their clothes.”

"The fashion industry needs to change its ways as quickly as a catwalk model changes their clothes"

Fashion and net zero

Fashion companies may be increasingly turning heads with their net-zero pledges, but many of these “are not worth the paper they’re written on”, according to Stand.earth. The North America-based environmental campaigners assessed 10 large fashion firms’ plans for reaching net-zero emissions. The companies – American Eagle, Fast Retailing, Gap Inc, H&M, Inditex, Kering, Levi’s, Lululemon, Nike and VF Corp – have targets to at least halve their direct or scope 1 and power-related or scope 2 emissions by 2030. However, Stand.earth points out that the Science Based Targets initiative has not verified half of the brands’ emissions goals. Half have not published interim goals before 2030.

Supply chains are another problem. Only H&M and Kering, have pledged to at least halve their indirect or scope 3 emissions this decade. They are the only two committed to 100% renewable energy across their supply chains by 2030. Only half of the brands have set independent targets to phase out thermal coal in supply chains. None shares baseline data on coal use.

Stand.earth also warns none of the 10 has public targets to reduce fossil-fuel-derived material use this decade, despite these representing around 15% to 20% of the fashion sector’s emissions footprint.

G20 countries’ projected fashion footprints

Countries need to aim for a per capita fashion consumption footprint of 128.7kg of CO₂e by 2030 to comply with the 1.5°C aspirational target of the Paris Agreement.

The 2030 average carbon footprints of fashion consumption for the G20 countries, measured in CO₂e and ranked from highest to lowest, is on track to be:

Huw Morris is a freelance journalist


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Four in five shoppers willing to pay ‘sustainability premium’

Despite cost-of-living concerns, four-fifths of shoppers are willing to pay more for sustainably produced or sourced goods, a global survey has found.

16th May 2024

Read more

Each person in the UK throws a shocking 35 items of unwanted clothes and textiles into general waste every year on average, according to a new report from WRAP.

2nd May 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Around 20% of the plastic recycled is polypropylene, but the diversity of products it protects has prevented safe reprocessing back into food packaging. Until now. David Burrows reports

3rd April 2024

Read more

A hangover from EU legislation, requirements on the need for consideration of nutrient neutrality for developments on many protected sites in England were nearly removed from the planning system in 2023.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Campaign group Wild Justice has accused the UK government of trying to relax pollution rules for housebuilders “through the backdoor”.

14th February 2024

Read more

Stella Consonni reports on the existing legal framework and the main challenges

15th January 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close