Offences cost paper company £455,000

17th May 2011

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Management ,
  • Prosecution ,
  • Pollution & Waste Management ,
  • Reporting



Environmental offences including misleading the Environment Agency (EA) have cost paper recycling company St Regis £455,000.

Exeter Crown Court was told that records about the amount of effluent discharged into a stream from the company’s mill in Cullompton, Devon were falsified. The EA, which brought the prosecution, alleged that St Regis and the site’s technical manager Christopher Steer were involved in the deception.

The site, Higher Kings Mill, operates under a pollution prevention and control (PPC) permit. A condition of the permit is that St Regis monitors its own effluent treatment plant and reports the results to the EA.

Stricter controls on effluent quality came into force in early 2005, but rather than invest between £300,000 and £1.2 million in upgrading the site’s treatment plant, to ensure it complied with the new discharge limits, the company told the EA it planned instead to install an oxygenation system in an attempt to improve the quality of effluent discharged into the River Culm.

The company trialled the equipment in early 2005 and reported “positive” results. Subsequent effluent quality results submitted to the agency by St Regis aroused suspicion because they were close to the permitted limits.

In March 2008, an EA officer asked to see the company’s daily environmental record sheets and noticed that one had been altered from a value well in excess (100mg/l) of the limit to just below the permitted maximum of 60mg/l. The court also heard that in order to assist its deception, the company installed a freshwater dilution system to dilute effluent with river water before it reached the sampling point. This dilution system was kept secret from the EA.

St Regis, the largest recycler of waste paper in the UK, was fined £162,000 after it was convicted of 19 charges under the PPC Regulations 2000. The judge also ordered it to pay £225,000 in a confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act, and £68,000 in court costs.

In a statement, the company said new measures had been introduced, including more intensive environmental auditing and testing regimes, to ensure there is no repeat of the environmental lapses that led to the firm being prosecuted.

However, it refutes the allegation that the firm intentionally made a false entry in a required EA record and says it is appealing against these charges and the associated fines.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Fifth of UK food firms unprepared for deforestation regulation

One in five UK food businesses are not prepared for EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) coming into force in December, a new survey has uncovered.

16th May 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Dr Julie Riggs issues a call to arms to tackle a modern-day human tragedy

15th March 2024

Read more

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

Campaign group Wild Justice has accused the UK government of trying to relax pollution rules for housebuilders “through the backdoor”.

14th February 2024

Read more

Digital tracking, packaging data delays and new collections provide a waste focus for this edition’s environmental round-up by legislation expert Neil Howe

28th November 2023

Read more

Environmental crimes could result in prison sentences of up to 10 years and company fines of 5% of turnover under a proposed EU law agreed by the European parliament and council.

21st November 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close