Most companies failing to track impact on biodiversity

16th March 2023


Seven out of 10 companies that disclosed their environmental impact to CDP last year did not monitor their impact on biodiversity, and are unprepared for incoming regulations.

In a new report, CDP – which runs the global disclosure system for environmental impacts – also reveals that just 500 out of 18,500 companies that reported their footprint last year had engaged with their suppliers on forests.

This is despite the landmark agreement made at COP15 last year urging large companies and financial institutions to assess and disclose their risks, impacts and dependencies on biodiversity by 2030.

The report also reveals that 70% of companies’ top management positions will not be incentivised to act on deforestation before 2025, while only 3% have water-related incentivisation in place for their chief procurement officer.

CDP said that businesses must engage with their suppliers on nature now, or risk falling foul of wide-ranging regulations that are “likely to be enforced this decade”.

“If a company is not preparing for future regulations on nature in the supply chain, they are open to a wide range of risks and could also be missing out on the opportunities that safeguarding nature will bring,” said Sonya Bhonsle, global head of value chains & regional director corporations at CDP.

“Quite simply, if a company wants to be in business in the future, they need to start embedding nature into the way that they buy and collaborating with suppliers to drive action in the supply chain.”

For climate, the picture is more positive, with 74% of companies reporting board-level oversight on climate change, and 41% of the remaining firms planning to introduce it in the next two years.

However, the report also reveals that just 41% of companies that disclosed to CDP last year reported any of their supply chain emissions, despite their impact being 11.4 times bigger than direct emissions.

One in 10 companies include climate-related requirements in their contracts with suppliers, but under 1% require them to set science-based targets.

“Environmental action is not happening at the speed, scale and scope required to limit global temperature rises to 1.5 °C, with many companies still not acknowledging that their impact on the environment extends far beyond their operations and that of climate change,” Bhonsle continued.

“We need to see environmental leadership from companies right now by tackling their impacts on climate change and nature together, working with their suppliers in an integrated way that includes nature as standard, and incentivising this engagement within their organisation.”

Image credit: Shutterstock

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Weather damage insurance claims hit record high

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

Senior consultant, EcoAct

3rd April 2024

Read more

Around 20% of the plastic recycled is polypropylene, but the diversity of products it protects has prevented safe reprocessing back into food packaging. Until now. David Burrows reports

3rd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close