Mixed reaction to mandatory GHG reporting

14th June 2011

Rexfeatures 1168660t crop

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Management ,
  • Waste ,
  • Reporting



A Defra consultation on whether companies should be forced to report their greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions has sparked a debate as to the effectiveness of the approach.

While many business and environmental organisations have responded enthusiastically to the consultation, the manufacturers’ body the EEF has warned that the government needs to consider its approach to climate change policy more strategically.

“With ongoing discussions about the future of climate change agreements and the Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency scheme, as well as the requirements of the EU emissions trading scheme to consider, our concern is that mandatory reporting isn’t seen in isolation,” said Susanne Barker, EEF senior climate and environment policy adviser.

“A holistic view must be taken on how these mechanisms will slot together to drive the right behaviour, but not be overly onerous, expensive and there for its own sake.”

Doug Parr, Greenpeace’s director of policy, also remains unconvinced. “Carbon footprinting has an important role to play, but I’m not sure that making it mandatory is the best option,” he said. “The danger is that businesses will spend too much time measuring and not enough time managing.”

However, the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) disagrees, arguing that “what gets measured gets managed.”

“Mandatory carbon reporting is a win-win-win situation,” said Cassie Chessum, CDP’s head of government relations.

“It provides transparency for shareholders, encourages behaviour change in businesses and supports government objectives to mitigate climate change. The government should seize this opportunity and introduce the required regulations.”

With more than 80% of IEMA members believing mandatory reporting should be introduced, the Institute has also welcomed the consultation.

“UK plc is at a turning point with environmental reporting; with the right support from government we can move GHG reporting into the mainstream and turn this into a business opportunity by helping companies to reduce costs and improve their competitiveness,” said policy director Martin Baxter.

The launch of the consultation came as the Environment Agency published its disclosures report which revealed that only 25% of FTSE listed companies reporting on their carbon dioxide emissions, water use or waste creation provided figures in line with government guidance.

The consultation closes on 5 July.

Puma leads the pack

International sportswear firm Puma has become the first company to publish the cost of the greenhouse gas (GHG) it produces and the water it wastes, in a ground-breaking environmental profit and loss statement.

Puma has calculated its overall environmental impact in 2010 as costing £82.7 million, with GHG emissions accounting for just under half of the total (£40.8 million).

“The environment profit and loss statement is an essential tool and a shift in how companies can account for and integrate into business models the true costs of their reliance on ecosystem services,” said Jochen Zeitz, chair of Puma.

The report reveals that Puma’s supply chain accounted for 85% of its GHG emissions and more than 99.9% of its water consumption.

Zeitz, who has come out in favour of mandating GHG emissions reporting, confirmed that Puma will be collaborating with the industry to adopt the profit and loss approach.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Weather damage insurance claims hit record high

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close