MEPs put ETS on critical list

14th May 2013


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Water ,
  • Manufacturing ,
  • Carbon Trading



The future of the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS) has been thrown into doubt after MEPs voted to reject plans by the European Commission to boost the price of allowances, which are now hovering around €3

The commission had wanted to delay the auctioning of 900 million allowances for five years to counteract the huge surplus of permits currently in the market, which has seen their price collapse. It believes that the process, known as “backloading”, would help the price of permits recover to €12 by 2015.

Despite support from several member states, including the UK, Denmark and France, MEPs in Strasbourg voted 334 to 315 against the measure.

The refusal by MEPs to support the plans for backloading leaves the ETS in chaos and will result in continued rock-bottom prices for carbon, according to market analysts Point Carbon.

Climate change commissioner Connie Hedegaard described the decision as a bad day for European emissions trading. Similarly, Richard Gledhill, a partner at PwC specialising in climate policy, carbon trading and markets, said the vote was another body blow for carbon markets in Europe.

“This hardly chimes with all the [EU] talk of ‘increasing ambition’ in the UN climate negotiations. Urgent reform is now needed to restore confidence in the markets and in the political process, ahead of the 2015 target for a global deal on climate change,” said Gledhill.

Chris Davies, Liberal Democrat MEP and columnist for the environmentalist, claimed that short-term financial concerns had overridden the desire to support low-carbon technologies. “MEPs have turned their back on the future,” he told the European parliament, condemning UK Conservative MEPs who had largely voted against the backloading proposals.

“By refusing to endorse the commission’s proposals I fear that MEPs have betrayed Europe’s long-term economic interests,” he said.

The short-term future of the ETS will now depend largely on the outcome of the European council meeting on 27 June. “We still have to hear from the council before we get to the end game for the [backloading] proposal,” commented Hedegaard, noting that the Irish presidency of the EU had signalled that it would prioritise the issue.

The council has yet to adopt a position on backloading, but Davies told the environmentalist he believed it would fail to reach an agreement at the June meeting.

A decision will “probably have to wait until after the German election in September,” he said, because senior members of the German coalition government are split over whether to intervene in the European carbon market.

In rejecting the proposal to delay auctions, MEPs sent it back to the EU parliament’s environment committee to look again at reform, possibly amending the plans before allowing MEPs a further vote.

“It is likely that the issue will come back to parliament, with amendments from the committee to be tabled this month, and then a vote early in July,” said Davies. “So the fight will be on to reverse some of the votes of last time and take a lead.”

Meanwhile, a new report from the House of Lords committee on Europe, looking at investment in energy infrastructure across the EU, warns that, if the price of carbon under the ETS languishes for long, its credibility as a deterrent to new coal investment will be lost.

It also claims the uncertainty in ETS revenues makes it impossible for member states to budget effectively, and that the plummeting price of allowances has reduced a major source of expected EU finance for the development of low-carbon technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS).

The NER-300 facility to support CCS demonstration projects has declined massively in value as the ETS price has collapsed, says the committee.


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Weather damage insurance claims hit record high

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Scottish government has today conceded that its goal to reduce carbon emissions by 75% by 2030 is now “out of reach” following analysis by the Climate Change Committee (CCC).

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

While there is no silver bullet for tackling climate change and social injustice, there is one controversial solution: the abolition of the super-rich. Chris Seekings explains more

4th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

Regulatory gaps between the EU and UK are beginning to appear, warns Neil Howe in this edition’s environmental legislation round-up

4th April 2024

Read more

Five of the latest books on the environment and sustainability

3rd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close