Let's all keep it proportionate

24th October 2013

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Consultancy ,
  • Construction ,
  • Local government



TEP's Amy Longmore discusses how practitioners could ensure that environmental statements are more proportionate

The environmental statement (ES) is produced from the input of many professional specialists: the environmental impact assessment (EIA) coordinator; the technical specialists; peer reviewers; the legal advisor; and the client.

Each has their own idea about what should go into an ES. The client may want to err on the side of caution and go above and beyond compliance to secure planning consent, but still want to control costs of producing the document.

Meanwhile, the technical specialist may lack focus on significant effects; the legal reviewer may require over-detailed project descriptions to show the iterative process; and the peer reviewer may request additional detail rather than suggesting streamlining.

The aim to ensure the ES is proportionate becomes a difficult task when trying to incorporate ideas from everyone involved in the process. This is also usually combined with producing the ES under time pressures and with resource constraints.

The ES can, therefore, become a larger-than-life document that is unmanageable and unreadable. Such a document is unhelpful to members of the public, consultees and the consenting authority attempting to understand the significant effects the development may have on the environment.

IEMA’s Quality Mark Forum 2013 brought to life how imperative it is to produce a proportionate ES that can be understood by everyone. While the EIA coordinator must ensure this focus is achieved, it should also be the emphasis for everyone involved in producing and inputting into an ES. A few ways everyone could ensure they are working with a “proportionate focus”, include:

  • Staying focused – it is much more difficult to produce a well-written and succinct ES than it is to produce an ES full of too much information. Revisit the wording of the EIA Regulations and ensure you focus on the main elements, namely:
    i) the aspects of the environment likely to be significantly affected;
    ii) the likely significant effects of the development on the environment; and
    iii) the measures envisaged to prevent, reduce and where possible offset and significant adverse effects on the environment.
  • Early and on-going engagement – start discussions with consultees early in the EIA process. This will aid with scoping and benefit the focus of the ES.
  • Scoping – all EIA practitioners know the importance of scoping out effects that are not likely to be significant, yet many are still afraid to do so. Be brave and justify your reasons for scoping out effects. Revisit the scope of the EIA as the project develops.
  • Presentation – use different presentation styles to report significant effects. Break up long descriptions of baseline information and project descriptions. Tables, bullet points, figures, diagrams and appendices are all ways that information can be presented clearly and succinctly.
  • Be a strong EIA coordinator – prepare clear guidance for the topic specialists regarding your aims of the ES. Make sure everyone involved is aware of what an ES should present and the need to be proportionate. This includes those, such as the client, who have an input to the ES but may not be directly involved and those new to EIA.

As we produce proportionate ES documents we will soon start to appreciate benefits, such as:

  • Time savings – time will not be spent on unnecessary assessments and collating of information.
  • Client savings – costs will be reduced as less time is spent on EIA.
  • Aiding the decision maker – a proportionate and focused ES will help the decision maker understand the effects of the development and lead to quicker determination time.
  • Developing best practice – producing proportionate ES documents will become habit.

It is inevitable that, at times, those involved in preparing information for an ES will go off-piste. Specialists may become bogged down in information, authorities may be highly conservative in scoping and the client may get worried about the risk of not gaining consent if the document feels “too light”.

EIA coordinators play a vital role to keep everything in check and put everyone back on the “proportionate track”. It is necessary to clearly communicate to those involved in the EIA process your aims and the intended methods of producing a proportionate ES.

We are all aware that ES documents need to be proportionate and we are becoming more open to the different ways this can be achieved. We now need to put it into practice and begin to reap the benefits.

This article was written as a contribution to the EIA Quality Mark’s commitment to improving EIA practice.

Amy Longmore is a senior environmental planner at TEP


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

New guidance maps out journey to digital environmental assessment

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is delighted to have published A Roadmap to Digital Environmental Assessment.

2nd April 2024

Read more

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close