Legal brief: Shippers of waste beware

10th February 2013


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Waste ,
  • CCS ,
  • Life Cycle Analysis ,
  • Procurement ,
  • Supply chain

Author

IEMA

Stephen Tromans details a recent Court of Appeal decision confirming that, when transporting materials, ignorance of whether containers hold hazardous waste is no defence

An unfortunate consequence of the growth in recycling rates is the increased opportunity for organisations, either unscrupulous or unwitting, to transport harmful wastes to unsuitable locations in developing countries, under the guise of recycling or recovery.

Such activities can present serious risks to the local environment and to human health.

The Environment Agency has been devoting considerable effort to detecting, investigating and prosecuting such cases. As a result, new case law is emerging on how to interpret relevant legislation, including the Transfrontier Shipment of Waste Regulations 2007 and the European Waste Shipment Regulation 1013/2006.

Transporting waste

In R v Ezeemo & Others [2012] EWCA Crim 2064, the seven appellants had been convicted of 21 charges of transporting hazardous waste - as listed in annex V of European Regulation 1013/2006 - in containers destined for Nigeria (a non-OECD country), contrary to the Regulation.

In the original prosecution, the appellants were found to have illegally transported approximately 159 tonnes of hazardous waste, including cathode ray tube televisions and fridge-freezers containing ozone-depleting substances and compressor oil.

The waste had been collected from civic amenity or waste disposal sites and then taken to collecting points where they were loaded into containers. Non-hazardous waste was also found in some of the containers.

The trial judge at Basildon Crown Court had ruled that there was sufficient evidence to convict each of the appellants for intending to transport waste to Nigeria.

The judge also ruled that, under Regulation 23 of the Transfrontier Shipment of Waste Regulations 2007, the offence was one that imposed strict liability - meaning that the prosecution was not required to prove that any of the defendants had knowledge that the product being transported was waste.

The appeal

At the Court of Appeal, it was argued that the trial judge had been wrong to direct the jury that, if they were sure the owner had discarded an electrical item at a civic amenity site then:

  • the item became waste within the meaning of the regulation;
  • did not cease to be waste until something was done to it to stop it being waste; and
  • when deciding whether something had been done to stop the item from being waste the intention of the defendant was immaterial.

It was also contended that the judge had been wrong to rule that the offence was one of strict liability, and requiring no proof that those accused knew that the product transported was waste or that they intended to transport waste to Nigeria for recovery.

Lord Justice Pitchford dismissed the appeal, finding that the trial judge had made no error of law and that the verdicts were safe.

He confirmed that there was a legal precedent which held that; once a substance, or object, had been discarded, the question of whether it had changed its status and become "waste" was one of fact - whether the holder discarded or intended to discard the items was judged by what he or she did with them.

Strict liability

Lord Pitchford also agreed that the offence of transporting hazardous electronic waste to a non-OECD country was one of strict liability, and so did not require proof of knowledge that the product transported was waste or that the intention was to transport the waste to Nigeria for recovery.

The Court of Appeal's ruling has the effect of catching those who may have no personal knowledge that a container holds waste or that its contents are destined for recovery in a non-OECD country. One reason for imposing strict liability is to promote greater vigilance among organisations who undertake activities that may cause harm to the public, such as waste recovery.

The obligation that the Regulations place on transport organisations is to take care to know exactly what is in the cargo they are transporting. If they do not, they risk breaching the Regulations.

The Court of Appeal decision will be welcomed by the Environment Agency, and by all those concerned about illegal shipments of waste to Africa and other non-OECD countries.

If regulators had to prove in each case that defendants knew that closed shipping containers held waste, their task would be impossible. The right approach is to place the onus of proper investigation and due diligence on those involved in consigning and transporting the material.


International shipments of waste

The Transfrontier Shipment of Waste Regulations 2007 supplement EU Regulation 1013/2006 (which implemented the Basel Convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous waste and their disposal), and the OECD Decision 107/final on the control of transboundary movements of waste destined for recovery operations.

The regulations make it illegal for: waste to enter or leave the UK for disposal, except in very limited circumstances; and for hazardous waste to be exported to non-OECD countries for recovery.

Further information and guidance is available from the Environment Agency online.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Swing voters show strong support for renewables

There is strong support for renewable energy as a source of economic growth among UK voters, particularly among those intending to switch their support for a political party.

16th May 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

The UK’s major cities lag well behind their European counterparts in terms of public transport use. Linking development to transport routes might be the answer, argues Huw Morris

3rd April 2024

Read more

Tom Harris examines the supply chain constraints facing the growing number of interconnector projects

2nd April 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

A consortium including IEMA and the Good Homes Alliance have drafted a letter to UK government ministers expressing disappointment with the proposed Future Homes Standard.

26th February 2024

Read more

Global corporations such as Amazon and Google purchased a record 46 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind energy last year, according to BloombergNEF (BNEF).

13th February 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close