Judicial review application of Green Belt decision refused

3rd April 2020

Web p11 case law istock 482766863

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Construction ,
  • Planning



A claimant applied for review of a local authority's decision to grant planning permission for Green Belt development involving aggregate extraction, subject to imposition of conditions and completion of an agreement under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

The claimant argued that: in failing to require a further hydrological assessment before granting permission, the authority had breached the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011; the authority had failed to satisfy legal requirements in relation to the statutory development plan; the planning officer had approached Green Belt preservation incorrectly, on a mistaken understanding that 'specific localised impacts' could not result in a failure to preserve openness, and the report did not discuss whether proposed screening measures might harm Green Belt openness; the authority's reliance on national air quality levels was unlawful, and it had not imposed adequate planning conditions to address the issue.

The judge concluded it was not necessary for all uncertainty to be resolved to achieve compliances. This case fell within the scope of the authority's entitlement and obligation to exercise judgment on the adequacy of available information, and it was entitled to conclude that it had adequate information. The report referred to the relevant policies, and it could not be argued that the authority's conclusion was unreasonable.

The judge stated that the report approached preservation correctly, taking a broader look at potential impacts rather than merely cataloguing specific impacts. Also, while the report did not question whether the screening measures might have a harmful impact, it plainly addressed the question of openness and concluded there was no material residual impact. There was no material error in its approach, and it was not arguable that the committee would have been materially misled.

The judge decided the evidence indicated that air pollution would be below national objective levels. There was no basis on which to speculate such levels might be damaging. The application was refused.

Picture credit: iStock


Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.

Transform articles

Interview: Andrew Winston on the many reasons for hope

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

Senior consultant, EcoAct

3rd April 2024

Read more

Around 20% of the plastic recycled is polypropylene, but the diversity of products it protects has prevented safe reprocessing back into food packaging. Until now. David Burrows reports

3rd April 2024

Read more

IEMA presents a digital campaign to share knowledge and inspire action in sustainability

2nd April 2024

Read more

Tom Harris examines the supply chain constraints facing the growing number of interconnector projects

2nd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close